I read in !emc-pstc that Charles Grasso <[email protected]> wrote (in <[email protected]>) about 'OK, what's going on?' on Fri, 28 Mar 2003: >John - Agreed. >But I would pose the question. If we can demonstrate that products are on >the market place - legitimatley - that FAIL by upwards of 20dB what >direction would you go in: > >a) Status quo >b) relaxation of the limits >c) elemination of the limits
See my other post about the need for **feedback** on the appropriateness of limits and the validity of test methods. If products that exceed a limit by 20 dB don't cause an unacceptable increased level of complaints, why retain the stringent limit: cui bono? But 20 dB is not infinity dB, even in consumer electronics (;-) Elimination of limits would allow things to be marketed that are effectively spark transmitters, and I don't think we'd tolerate that. -- Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Interested in professional sound reinforcement and distribution? Then go to http://www.isce.org.uk PLEASE do NOT copy news posts to me by E-MAIL! This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. Visit our web site at: http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/ To cancel your subscription, send mail to: [email protected] with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc For help, send mail to the list administrators: Ron Pickard: [email protected] Dave Heald: [email protected] For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: [email protected] Jim Bacher: [email protected] Archive is being moved, we will announce when it is back on-line. All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
