I read in !emc-pstc that Pryor McGinnis <[email protected]> wrote (in <[email protected]>) about 'OK, what's going on?' on Fri, 28 Mar 2003:
> Do you not understand that the original unit submitted for EMC > Testing may have passed with flying colors, only to be changed > during production (either by parts from different vendors or > production methods, etc.) that resuldted in the units being > produced that no longer meet the limits? In Europe that wouldn't wash. The technical file has to be kept up to date with all engineering changes, **which are supposed to be signed off by the EMC authorized person as either not requiring re-testing or have been proved with re-testing**. Same for safety. -- Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Interested in professional sound reinforcement and distribution? Then go to http://www.isce.org.uk PLEASE do NOT copy news posts to me by E-MAIL! This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. Visit our web site at: http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/ To cancel your subscription, send mail to: [email protected] with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc For help, send mail to the list administrators: Ron Pickard: [email protected] Dave Heald: [email protected] For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: [email protected] Jim Bacher: [email protected] Archive is being moved, we will announce when it is back on-line. All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
