Ken,

It depends if compliance with the Ethernet standard is important to you.  If
you connect to anyone else's network where someone else may be dealing with
a coax that is grounded on your end, then it is probably important.  If not,
then it may not matter.  This is a product safety issue.  I have used
10BaseT (10 Megabit twisted pair Ethernet) in which we shield on both ends
within our system.  Whatever goes out to the world is not grounded on either
end.

I am assuming from your messages that this may be a military system, so the
product safety rules may be different than for commercial equipment.

Jim


Jim Knighten, Ph.D.
Teradata, a Division of NCR             http://www.ncr.com
17095 Via Del Campo
San Diego, CA 92127
USA
Tel: 858-485-2537
Fax: 858-485-3788
[email protected]

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Ken Javor [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent:   Wednesday, March 05, 2003 1:09 PM
To:     Robert Macy; [email protected]
Subject:        Re: Ethernet coax connection


If all the ac equipment is powered by the same local source, and all the ac
powered equipment is case-grounded within the same rack, is it correct to
assume that the safety issue is moot?  That is, can I then use a grounded
bnc connector at both ends?

on 3/5/03 4:02 PM, Robert Macy at [email protected] wrote:

> It is my understanding there is a spec relating to both the voltage
handling
> capability and the impedance between ethernet coax and earth ground.
> 
> At low frequency (must be more than a certain level) it is quite high in
> order to prevent potentially damaging ground loops from forming.  At high
> frequency (must be less than a certain level) to effectively reference the
> shield to chassis potential and make certain that the coax doesn't
radiate.
> 
> There are manufacturers that sell coax panel connectors with the "proper"
> built in capacitor.  I recall $10 each price tag.
> 
> I further recall that we used to use 0.001uF 2kV caps.  WELL DRESSED AND
> MOUNTED EXTREMELY PROPERLY.
> 
> Vaguely remember that the impedance was to be more than 1Meg at 60Hz and
> less than 50 at 3MHz, but you should check the ethernet spec.
> 
> You can tell a lot about the cap's mounting (and quality) by looking at
the
> spectrum of the radiated emissions.  For example, internal clock and the
cap
> is referenced to a noisy spot.  Or, spectrum related to the ethernet
traffic
> and a loop exists around the coax terminations and bypass cap.
> 
> - Robert -
> 
> Robert A. Macy, PE    [email protected]
> 408 286 3985              fx 408 297 9121
> AJM International Electronics Consultants
> 101 E San Fernando, Suite 402
> San Jose, CA  95112
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ken Javor" <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 12:37 PM
> Subject: Ethernet coax connection
> 
> 
>> 
>> Question for list members:
>> 
>> Background:  I am troubleshooting a complex integration of military
> hardware
>> and COTS.  One COTS piece of equipment has an RG-58 coaxial connection,
> but
>> the coax connector is an isolated feedthrough bnc.  From a radiated
>> emissions point-of-view, that is hurting us.  One of the engineers here
> said
>> that is part of the spec - Ethernet shields are not supposed to be
chassis
>> grounded.
>> 
>> Question:  Can someone please explain the reason for that, and how this
is
>> usually handled to minimize radiated emissions?
>> 
>> Thank you.
>> 
>> Ken Javor
>> EMC Compliance
>> Huntsville, Alabama
>> 256/650-5261
>> 
> 
> 

-- 

Ken Javor
EMC Compliance
Huntsville, Alabama
256/650-5261




This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
     [email protected]
with the single line:
     unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
     Ron Pickard:              [email protected]
     Dave Heald:               [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:
     Richard Nute:           [email protected]
     Jim Bacher:             [email protected]

Archive is being moved, we will announce when it is back on-line.
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
    http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc


This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
     [email protected]
with the single line:
     unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
     Ron Pickard:              [email protected]
     Dave Heald:               [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:
     Richard Nute:           [email protected]
     Jim Bacher:             [email protected]

Archive is being moved, we will announce when it is back on-line.
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
    http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc

Reply via email to