I read in !emc-pstc that Ralph McDiarmid <[email protected]> wrote (in <67C475A5ECE7D4118AEC0002B325CAB602D2F9F1@BCMAIL1>) about 'Performance Criterion' on Mon, 28 Apr 2003: >I suggest each Performance Criterion might be re-written as follows: > >"Criterion A - No loss of function or performance allowed during or after >the test. The product must operate as intended and meet its performance >specifications.
Oh, right. 'Meet its performance specifications'. Allow NO degradation of signal-to-noise ratio, bit error rate, gain (not even 0.001 dB) etc. Luckily, the people who wrote the original Generics were more practical. -- Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Interested in professional sound reinforcement and distribution? Then go to http://www.isce.org.uk PLEASE do NOT copy news posts to me by E-MAIL! This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. Visit our web site at: http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/ To cancel your subscription, send mail to: [email protected] with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc For help, send mail to the list administrators: Ron Pickard: [email protected] Dave Heald: [email protected] For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: [email protected] Jim Bacher: [email protected] Archive is being moved, we will announce when it is back on-line. All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
