I read in !emc-pstc that Pommerenke, David <[email protected]> wrote (in <[email protected]>) about 'ESD gun verification' on Wed, 7 May 2003:
>Brain, Spelling! > >I like to repeat: For "verification" you do not need calibrated >equipment or full bandwidth. The "verification" is just a method to >increase trust in the calibration. If you use some homemade current >target and a 500 MHz scope, you will get a pretty good picture of the >waveform and detect most changes in an ESD generator. > >A comb-generator run on an OATS is not a NSA calibration, still it >establishes trust in the antennas, cables and the spectrum analyzer. Quite right and sensible, but tell that to a UK metrologist! If it's not 200% accurate, it's not believable.(;-) -- Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Interested in professional sound reinforcement and distribution? Then go to http://www.isce.org.uk PLEASE do NOT copy news posts to me by E-MAIL! This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. Visit our web site at: http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/ To cancel your subscription, send mail to: [email protected] with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc For help, send mail to the list administrators: Ron Pickard: [email protected] Dave Heald: [email protected] For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: [email protected] Jim Bacher: [email protected] Archive is being moved, we will announce when it is back on-line. All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
