I read in !emc-pstc that Peter L. Tarver <[email protected]> wrote (in <[email protected]>) about 'fuse replacement markings' on Tue, 26 Aug 2003:
>Is anyone aware of any CTL decisions for >> IEC60950:2000 or -1, where operator accessible >> fuse replacement marking requirements may be >> waived, based on the fuse not being required for >> safety reasons (did not open during any test >> under any conditions of test) and where of the >> fuse may be replaced by an operator/user? I know of no such waiver, and I don't really find that surprising: a) If the fuse never opens, delete it and mark it as a cost- improvement; b) normally, it is so easy to mark the fuse spec, like 'T 1 A H', that it would not be worth asking for a waiver. -- Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Interested in professional sound reinforcement and distribution? Then go to http://www.isce.org.uk PLEASE do NOT copy news posts to me by E-MAIL! This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. Visit our web site at: http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/ To cancel your subscription, send mail to: [email protected] with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc For help, send mail to the list administrators: Ron Pickard: [email protected] Dave Heald: [email protected] For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: [email protected] Jim Bacher: [email protected] Archive is being moved, we will announce when it is back on-line. All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
