repost

> From: Peter L. Tarver
> [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 9:49 AM
> To: PSTC
> Subject: fuse replacement markings
>
>
> The following query relates to IEC60950:2000 and
> -1, §1.7.6.
>
> Is anyone aware of any CTL decisions for
> IEC60950:2000 or -1, where operator accessible
> fuse replacement marking requirements may be
> waived, based on the fuse not being required for
> safety reasons (did not open during any test
> under any conditions of test) and where of the
> fuse may be replaced by an operator/user?
>
> I have checked the CB Scheme web site and found
> no CTL Decisions related to §1.7.6.  I ask
> because I've seen references to CTL Decisions on
> this list that were not posted on that web site.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Peter L. Tarver, PE
> Product Safety Manager
> Homologation Services
> Sanmina-SCI Corp.
> San Jose, CA
> [email protected]



This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
     [email protected]
with the single line:
     unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
     Ron Pickard:              [email protected]
     Dave Heald:               [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:
     Richard Nute:           [email protected]
     Jim Bacher:             [email protected]

Archive is being moved, we will announce when it is back on-line.
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
    http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc

Reply via email to