I read in !emc-pstc that Neil Helsby <[email protected]> wrote (in <[email protected]>) about 'UL60950-1 update' on Tue, 9 Dec 2003: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original Message <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< > >On 08/12/2003, 21:27:42, John Woodgate <[email protected]> wrote >regarding Re: UL60950-1 update: > >> >As I read more of these standards, I become more discouraged and they >> >really need not be so complex. > >> I suggest you participate in the work, so that you can actively reduce >> any bloating or unnecessary complexity that you detect. >> >Many years ago I tried to do this but was informed that only people >recommended by a "trade association" would be considered. Although I >have been employed by a number of organisations, both large and small, >none has been a member of such an association and no opporunities to get >involved would therefore be afforded.
Perhaps not directly as a standards committee member. But learned societies, such as the Audio Engineering Society, IEEE and IEE, are involved in standards work and can, through various channels, submit input to national and international standards committees. People even send their standards problems to this group, and sometimes we can help. -- Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Interested in professional sound reinforcement and distribution? Then go to http://www.isce.org.uk PLEASE do NOT copy news posts to me by E-MAIL! This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. Visit our web site at: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ To cancel your subscription, send mail to: [email protected] with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc For help, send mail to the list administrators: Ron Pickard: [email protected] Dave Heald: [email protected] For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: [email protected] Jim Bacher: [email protected] All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
