>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original Message <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
On 08/12/2003, 21:27:42, John Woodgate <[email protected]> wrote
regarding Re: UL60950-1 update:
> >As I read more of these standards, I become more discouraged and they
> >really need not be so complex.
> I suggest you participate in the work, so that you can actively reduce
> any bloating or unnecessary complexity that you detect.
>
Many years ago I tried to do this but was informed that only people
recommended by a "trade association" would be considered. Although I have
been employed by a number of organisations, both large and small, none
has been a member of such an association and no opporunities to get
involved would therefore be afforded.
Regards,
Neil Helsby
**********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.
This footnote confirms that this email message has been swept
for the presence of computer viruses and is believed to be clean.
**********************************************************************
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
Visit our web site at: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
[email protected]
with the single line:
unsubscribe emc-pstc
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Ron Pickard: [email protected]
Dave Heald: [email protected]
For policy questions, send mail to:
Richard Nute: [email protected]
Jim Bacher: [email protected]
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
