Given that information, I clearly do not have an answer, however there is the
old saying:
 
"They are Federal Regulations, you're not _supposed_ to understand them!"
 
Who did you talk to at the FCC?
 
Brent


From: Grasso, Charles [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2004 11:23 AM
To: 'Brent DeWitt'; '[email protected]'
Subject: RE: Speaking of limits above 1GHz



Hi Brent,

 

Thanks for your comments. I have pasted below a response from the FCC:

"Acceptance of a GTEM cell for compliance testing is addressed in Public
Notice 54796 dated July 12, 1995 and in  ANSI C63.4-2001.  I do not have an
electronic copy of the public notice, but I will fax you a copy at
303-723-3901.  Since the standard OATS with which the GTEM is correlated for
acceptance only covers the frequency range 30 to 1000 MHz, there is no
standard for correlation of a GTEM outside this range."

 

Hence my confusion and my qs which I repeat:

If : the application is invalid because of the lack of site attenuation
specifications then why does the FCC insist on testing above 1GHz? How can the
data taken above 1GHz be OK for the DoC and not for qualifying a GTEM

 

 

 

 

Best Regards
Charles Grasso
Senior Compliance Engineer
Echostar Communications Corp.
Tel:  303-706-5467
Fax: 303-799-6222
Cell: 303-204-2974
Email: [email protected]; <mailto:[email protected]; %20> 
 
Email Alternate: [email protected]

 


From: Brent DeWitt [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2004 8:28 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Speaking of limits above 1GHz

 

Hi Chaz,

 

Something is clearly missing in this exchange between you and the FCC.  The
implied stand by the FCC is that a GTEM cannot be used above 1 GHz because the
published methodology for correlation has not been proven valid in that
frequency range.  Rather ironic since the GTEM becomes a more valid substitute
for an OATS as you go above 1 GHz.

 

Brent DeWitt

Loveland, CO

(looking for work since layoff last Friday)


From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Charles Grasso
Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2004 8:13 PM
To: Pettit, Ghery; Derek Walton; [email protected]
Subject: Speaking of limits above 1GHz

Recently we sent a application into the FCC to have our GTEM FCC "approved"
for remote qualification. The application was rejected by the FCC on the
grounds that as there was no site attenuation requirements above 1GHz. Can
some one please explain the logic?

 

If : the application is invalid because of the lack of site attenuation
specifications then why does the FCC insist on testing above 1GHz? How can the
data taken above 1GHz br OK for the DoC and not for qualifying a GTEM??

 

For those who may not know: the FCC has published a methodology for
demonstrating correlation between a GTEM and an OATS.

Our GTEM meets that correlation criteria.

 

Confused in Colorado.


From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Pettit, Ghery
Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2004 4:04 PM
To: Derek Walton; [email protected]
Subject: RE: EN 55022

EN 55022 (and CISPR 22) only specify limits to 1 GHz.  The only limits I know
of above 1 GHz are the FCC's.

 

Ghery Pettit

Intel Corporation

 

 


From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Derek Walton
Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2004 2:35 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: EN 55022

 

Hi Folks,

I was asked a question. EN 55022 currently calls for stopping testing at 1
GHz... Or does it?

What guidlines would one follow to test a 2 GHz PC?

Thanks,
-- 
Derek N. Walton
L F Rsearch
Poplar Grove, IL61065, USA 

------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE EMC
Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. Visit our
web site at: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ To cancel your subscription, send mail
to: [email protected] with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc For help,
send mail to the list administrators: Ron Pickard: [email protected] Dave
Heald: [email protected] For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute:
[email protected] Jim Bacher: [email protected] All emc-pstc postings are
archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc


Reply via email to