Recently we sent a application into the FCC to have our GTEM FCC "approved" for remote qualification. The application was rejected by the FCC on the grounds that as there was no site attenuation requirements above 1GHz. Can some one please explain the logic? If : the application is invalid because of the lack of site attenuation specifications then why does the FCC insist on testing above 1GHz? How can the data taken above 1GHz br OK for the DoC and not for qualifying a GTEM?? For those who may not know: the FCC has published a methodology for demonstrating correlation between a GTEM and an OATS. Our GTEM meets that correlation criteria. Confused in Colorado.
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Pettit, Ghery Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2004 4:04 PM To: Derek Walton; [email protected] Subject: RE: EN 55022 EN 55022 (and CISPR 22) only specify limits to 1 GHz. The only limits I know of above 1 GHz are the FCC’s. Ghery Pettit Intel Corporation From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Derek Walton Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2004 2:35 PM To: [email protected] Subject: EN 55022 Hi Folks, I was asked a question. EN 55022 currently calls for stopping testing at 1 GHz... Or does it? What guidlines would one follow to test a 2 GHz PC? Thanks, -- Derek N. Walton L F Rsearch Poplar Grove, IL61065, USA ------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. Visit our web site at: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ To cancel your subscription, send mail to: [email protected] with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc For help, send mail to the list administrators: Ron Pickard: [email protected] Dave Heald: [email protected] For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: [email protected] Jim Bacher: [email protected] All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
