I read in !emc-pstc that Grasso, Charles <[email protected]> wrote (in <2EC9D5B6733DE64BB79CEB13AC874A1A33C6AF@riv- excha2.echostar.com>) about 'Speaking of limits above 1GHz' on Fri, 13 Feb 2004:
> If : the application is invalid because of the lack of site > attenuation specifications then why does the FCC insist on testing > above 1GHz? How can the data taken above 1GHz be OK for the DoC and > not for qualifying a GTEM What happens if you ask the FCC that question? -- Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. The good news is that nothing is compulsory. The bad news is that everything is prohibited. http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Also see http://www.isce.org.uk This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. Visit our web site at: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ To cancel your subscription, send mail to: [email protected] with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc For help, send mail to the list administrators: Ron Pickard: [email protected] Dave Heald: [email protected] For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: [email protected] Jim Bacher: [email protected] All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
