Hello,

I posted my question at sci.engr.electrical.compliance and was suggested to
post it here.
So here it is.

I'm trying to find if it is possible to do RS485 without optoisolation.
EN61000-6-2 and EN50130-4 needs interface to work with common mode
disturbance in 150kHz to 100MHz range of 10V (80% AM modulation) and 150 Ohm
source impedance. This gives me 18V top signal level. I've read that it is
good practice to add extra 6dB (measurements inaccuracy and element
distortions).
This way I have 36V.
I wont to communicate with 115kb/s (I plan to use IC-s with limited
slew-rate), so even high impedance common mode choke should make no problem.
I assume up to 32 devices and up to 1km line.
I see two solutions:
Solution 1.
CM choke 2x2mH + 2.2nF capacitor at each line to ground. This reduces 36V to
acceptable values but gives me 1.1nF differential mode.
Can this 1n1 be a problem ?
I can increase L and decrease C. But the higher L the lower its resonant
frequency and I'll have more problems with attenuating higher frequencies.
Solution 2.
CM choke 3x5mH with no capacitors. RS485 with third wire connecting grounds
of communicating devices. I've read somewhere that only 3 wire RS485 is the
right solution. In this third wire I can place 100 Ohm to avoid ground
difference currents. This solution seems to be very good. One coil senses
the CM voltage and subtracts it from signal lines. If it is a good solution
and RS485 is popular than CM choke manufacturers should have a large offer
with 3 coil chokes of several mH inductance but they don't. CM chokes with 3
(and more) wires are widely offered but for higher frequencies. From that I
think that I am doing somewhere a mistake. But where ?

Connected with that subject is the question: Can I connect my circuit ground
with Earth ground via 100 Ohm, and than directly connect circuit grounds of
communicating devices with this third wire. May be the choke will be not
needed at all (probably if I reduce my needs from 36V to 18V).
My devices are powered from external 12V power supply selected by installer
(not me).
I don't know where the problems can arise from in this situation ?

Thanks in advance for any comments.

Piotr Galka  [email protected]





This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
     [email protected]
with the single line:
     unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
     Ron Pickard:              [email protected]
     Dave Heald:               [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:
     Richard Nute:           [email protected]
     Jim Bacher:             [email protected]

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
    http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc

Reply via email to