In article <[email protected]>, Peter L. Tarver <[email protected]> writes
>Ah, a hint of agreement. Just a hint. I'm not trying to indulge in contentious argument. I HOPED that I was explaining a bit about how the OSM decisions relate to the relevant standards and how they should be regarded by test houses - all test houses. Also, how OSM decisions are now being reviewed for incorporation in standards as quickly as possible, or published as official interpretations. -- Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. The good news is that nothing is compulsory. The bad news is that everything is prohibited. http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Also see http://www.isce.org.uk This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected] Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/listserv/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Ron Pickard: [email protected] Dave Heald: [email protected] For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: [email protected] Jim Bacher: [email protected] All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
