In article <E1BA0362B28ED211A1E80008C71EA306020701D0@EXC_EAS01>, Gordon,Ian <[email protected]> writes
>Does anyone know why 3 and 10V/m were chosen for radiated immunity >testing? Obviously these are merely the minima to be used, but there >must have been some logic behind the values? If you have information on >the logic behind the levels chosen for other tests then that would also >be appreciated. Those test levels reduced the number of complaints of interference due to lack of immunity made to the old European PTT authorities to an acceptable minimum. Oh, there are other explanations, but if the test levels did not achieve that major objective, they would have been changed. -- Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. The good news is that nothing is compulsory. The bad news is that everything is prohibited. http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Also see http://www.isce.org.uk This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected] Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/listserv/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Ron Pickard: [email protected] Scott Douglas [email protected] For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: [email protected] Jim Bacher: [email protected] All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
