It's not obvious to me why the US approach wouldn't work elsewhere.  There
doesn't seem much potential for harm in such a device, and it is really
handy.

> From: "Lothar Schmidt" <[email protected]>
> Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2005 11:41:57 -0700
> To: "Ken Javor" <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>
> Subject: RE: Radiated emission measurement below 30MHz
> 
> Ken,
> 
> This is a good example. IN Europe this is not allowed by the rules. Any
> intentional radiator need to have license. Some can be general some are
> individual and it is not a matter of power. It is only the intentional
> part which is important.
> 
> Lothar Schmidt
> 
> Technical Manager EMC, SAR, Antenna testing and BQB
> 
> CETECOM Inc. 
> 411 Dixon Landing Road
> Milpitas, CA 95035
> 
> Phone +1 408 586 6214
> Fax     +1 408 586 6299
> 
> This e-mail may contain proprietary, privileged and confidential
> information for the sole use of the named intended recipient. Any review
> or distribution of this e-mail by any party other than the intended
> recipient or that person's agent is strictly prohibited. If you are not
> the intended recipient, please delete all copies and immediately Contact
> the sender. You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose,
> distribute, print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the
> intended recipient.
> Thank you.
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
> Of Ken Javor
> Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2005 10:59 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Radiated emission measurement below 30MHz
> 
> You are vastly OVERESTIMATING the load at 10 pF.  A 41" rod over a
> ground
> plane is a 10 pF load.
> 
> I find this thread interesting.  I can buy an audio input device
> transmitting in the FM band for the purpose of playing an audio device
> through my automobile stereo system.  Clearly this device was designed
> to
> intentionally transmit in the FM band, and further it must transmit with
> the
> same modulation and at the same center frequencies as stipulated by law
> for
> the FM band.
> 
> So it is not as simple as saying you can't transmit in a broadcast band.
> There is the issue of control.  If I am using the above described
> device, I
> will choose an FM channel not currently being broadcast on, and the
> power
> level is low enough it only reaches a few feet.
> 
>> From: "Robert A. Macy" <[email protected]>
>> Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2005 08:52:23 -0700
>> To: John Woodgate <[email protected]>
>> Cc: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: Radiated emission measurement below 30MHz
>> 
>> It radiated an ELECTROSTATIC field.  We're talking voltage
>> field of 100V at 150KHz.  A little 1 inch wire poked out
>> with 100 V on it.  Current was the load of the parasitic
>> capacitance around 10pF.  You can't even see that 10 m away
>> 
>> Yet, not allowed, go figure.
>> 
>> - Robert -
>> 
>> On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 05:33:29 +0100
>> John Woodgate <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Robert A. Macy <[email protected]> wrote (in
>>> <[email protected]>) about 'Radiated emission
>>> measurement below 30MHz', on Mon, 11 Jul 2005:
>>>> Is this allowed?
>>>> 
>>>> It was my understanding that one of my clients tried to
>>> get a *very* low power intentianal "radiator" [at these
>>> frequencies, radiator is a euphemism] through Europe and
>>> due to some application there, couldn't even start
>>> although the power could not even be measured within 10
>>> meters.
>>>> Seriously, there was NOTHING at 10 m.  They saw
>>> "intentional radiator"
>>>> 150KHz, and said NO.
>>>> 
>>>> Did we use the wrong people?
>>> 
>>> It's difficult to tell. Was 150 kHz the actual operating
>>> frequency or did it just emit (marginally) at that
>>> frequency? 150 kHz is just above the lower end of the LF
>>> broadcast band (lower end 148.5 kHz) and it could be
>>> argued that no intentional radiator can be accepted whose
>>> operating frequency is in a broadcast band.
>>> -- 
>>> Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only.
>>> Deadlines are 90% of deadliness.
>>> http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Also see
>>> http://www.isce.org.uk
>>> 
>>> 
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>>> This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering
>>> Society
>>> emc-pstc discussion list.    Website:
>>> http://www.ieee-pses.org/
>>> 
>>> To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
>>> [email protected]
>>> 
>>> Instructions:
>>> 
>> http://listserv.ieee.org/listserv/request/user-guide.html
>>> 
>>> List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
>>> 
>>> For help, send mail to the list administrators:
>>> 
>>> Scott Douglas             [email protected]
>>> Mike Cantwell            [email protected]
>>> 
>>> For policy questions, send mail to:
>>> 
>>> Richard Nute:           [email protected]
>>> Jim Bacher:             [email protected]
>>> 
>>> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the
>>> web at:
>>> 
>>> http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
>> 
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>> This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
>> emc-pstc discussion list.    Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
>> 
>> To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected]
>> 
>> Instructions:
> http://listserv.ieee.org/listserv/request/user-guide.html
>> 
>> List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
>> 
>> For help, send mail to the list administrators:
>> 
>> Scott Douglas             [email protected]
>> Mike Cantwell            [email protected]
>> 
>> For policy questions, send mail to:
>> 
>> Richard Nute:           [email protected]
>> Jim Bacher:             [email protected]
>> 
>> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
>> 
>> http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
>> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
> emc-pstc discussion list.    Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
> 
> To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected]
> 
> Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/listserv/request/user-guide.html
> 
> List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
> 
> For help, send mail to the list administrators:
> 
> Scott Douglas             [email protected]
> Mike Cantwell            [email protected]
> 
> For policy questions, send mail to:
> 
> Richard Nute:           [email protected]
> Jim Bacher:             [email protected]
> 
> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
> 
> http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
> 


This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
emc-pstc discussion list.    Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/

To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected]

Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/listserv/request/user-guide.html

List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:

     Scott Douglas             [email protected]
     Mike Cantwell            [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:

     Richard Nute:           [email protected]
     Jim Bacher:             [email protected]

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:

    http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc

Reply via email to