[email protected] wrote (in <of28d52d75.66dfb800-on882570cb.005cfd5c-882570cb.005d9...@teal.com>) about 'IEC Just Published', on Fri, 2 Dec 2005: >... and for those of us who use product standards with undated >references, like EN60601-1-2?
Are you sure it's an undated reference. Don't look at Clause 2 but at Annex ZA. CENELEC now recognizes the problems with undated references, and prefers dated references. While 'dated' and 'undated' references both have advantages and disadvantages, more or less balanced, the overriding advantage, in my opinion, is that with a dated reference, there is NO DOUBT as to which version shall be used. The subject is still under discussion in IEC/CISPR, though. One might have thought there was quite sufficient 'uncertainty' in EMC already, without adding uncertainty about which edition of each standard applies on any given day. > >I currently have IEC61000-4-5:1995 with Amendment 1. What are the >differences in the second edition of IEC61000-4-5? In my opinion, you must have access to a copy of the standard if it is 'applied' to your product. It isn't sufficient to ask others what it says. -- Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. Deadlines are 90% of deadliness. http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Also see http://www.isce.org.uk - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected] Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas [email protected] Mike Cantwell [email protected] For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: [email protected] David Heald: [email protected] All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
