I can't speak to the EMC standards as I am a safety engineer but I have
found that most changes/ amendments in safety standards, i.e.
Audio/Video IEC60065 and ITE IEC60950 tend to be either relaxation of
the requirements or clarifications based on user input to the various
Agencies who populate the standards committees. In my experience I did
not find the amendments that happen each year or so to the above safety
standards as a bad thing or present a moving target as I believe they
had little or no negative impact on product designs......

If you are talking UL safety standards I think you have a case as there
have been several mid stream amendments in the UL6500 standard which
made the requirements more stringent which impacted our designs
requiring engineering work to comply...But in UL's defense they did make
our products safer so this is not a complaint but a statement in
fact.....Of course this added extra cost to the products so not everyone
was happy.........

EMC on the other hand may be a different kettle of fish??


From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ken
Javor
Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 4:55 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Making Standards Free, different take


Well clearly the standards are in a constant change of flux.  But my
point is that the purpose of a standard is to standardize.  If the
standard is a constantly changing target, the point of standardization
is lost, or at least severely diminished.

To paraphrase an old saw, "There comes a time in the life of every
program to shoot the engineers and start production."

I'm not advocating shooting anyone, but if the cycle time were limited
to no less than five years, maybe there would be time to get the kinks
out before the next revision.

> From: John Woodgate <[email protected]>
> Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 20:48:35 +0000
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Making Standards Free, different take
> 
> In message <bfeac273.354a9%[email protected]>, dated Wed, 11

> Jan 2006, Ken Javor <[email protected]> writes
>> My comment was limited to EMC and product safety.  I didn't state 
>> that, but that was my frame of mind.  I don't think technology here 
>> changes that fast.
> 
> I attended today a meeting of one of the four UK national committees 
> dealing exclusively with EMC; this one deals with methods of 
> measurement (CISPR and parallel CENELEC standards). The Agenda is 
> seven pages, and a typical page lists 24 standards documents.
> 
> Something's changing!
> --
> OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk
> 2006 is YMMVI- Your mileage may vary immoderately.
> 
> John Woodgate
> 
> -
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
> emc-pstc discussion list.    Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
> 
> To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected]
> 
> Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
> 
> List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
> 
> For help, send mail to the list administrators:
> 
> Scott Douglas           [email protected]
> Mike Cantwell           [email protected]
> 
> For policy questions, send mail to:
> 
> Jim Bacher:             [email protected]
> David Heald:            [email protected]
> 
> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
> 
> http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
> 

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
emc-pstc discussion list.    Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/

To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected]

Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html

List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:

     Scott Douglas           [email protected]
     Mike Cantwell           [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:

     Jim Bacher:             [email protected]
     David Heald:            [email protected]

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:

    http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
emc-pstc discussion list.    Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/

To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected]

Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html

List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:

     Scott Douglas           [email protected]
     Mike Cantwell           [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:

     Jim Bacher:             [email protected]
     David Heald:            [email protected]

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:

    http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc

Reply via email to