In message <468F3FDA28AA87429AD807992E22D07E080A806E@orsmsx408>, dated Wed, 11 Jan 2006, "Pettit, Ghery" <[email protected]> writes
>Good point. And one that is not lost on CISPR SC I. CISPR 22 is going >into a 3 year maintenance cycle where, once the 2nd amendment to CISPR >22:2005 is published (this month?) there will be no further changes >published until 2008. Not to say that we won't be working on things, >but nothing will be published until then at the earliest. 4th Edition >of CISPR 22 was amended so fast, with 5th Edition following on its >heels that nobody even adopted the 4th Edition. What a circus. It wasn't a 'circus' (and I'm not directly involved in CISPR/I, so I'm not defensive). A genuine but very serious mistake was made. This threw out the synchronization (well, plesiochronization) of CISPR and CENELEC standards. It took a l--o--n--g time to sort out. Such events are bound to occur occasionally, even though once is too often. An IEC/CISPR maintenance cycle can be anything for 2 to 12 years, but 2 years is almost impossible, given the time required for comment and voting. -- OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk 2006 is YMMVI- Your mileage may vary immoderately. John Woodgate - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected] Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas [email protected] Mike Cantwell [email protected] For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: [email protected] David Heald: [email protected] All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
