Hi Folks,

just for my own benifit, why would CISPR 16 be the right choice. I 
thought CISPR 16 was intended to define everything about testing EXCEPT 
the methods and limits.

Cheers,

Derek.

John Woodgate wrote on 9/8/2006, 4:15 AM:

 > In message
 > <[email protected]>, dated
 > Fri, 8 Sep 2006, [email protected] writes
 >
 > >CISPR 11 is specifically for ISM RF equipment. It only applies to
 > >equipment that intentionally radiates in the ISM bands and should not
 > >therefore be quoted for other equipment.
 >
 > No, it doesn't only apply to intentional radiators. It applies to
 > anything that uses radio-frequency energy, with, now, a very liberal
 > definition of 'radio-frequency'. In fact, the scope is so ambiguous that
 > it could be applied to almost anything. Steps are being taken to correct
 > this.
 > >
 > >My point is that 61326-1:2005 calls (in my opinion, incorrectly) CISPR
 > >11 for all equipment types, when it ought to be CISPR 16 for the
 > >non-ISM stuff.
 >
 > I believe you are right; it sound like a simple typo with BIG
 > consequences. Do we have anyone involved with IEC SC65A who can take
 > this up?
 > --
 > OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk
 > There are benefits from being irrational - just ask the square root of 2.
 > John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK
 >
 > -
 > ----------------------------------------------------------------
 > This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
 > emc-pstc discussion list.    Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
 >
 > To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected]
 >
 > Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
 >
 > List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
 >
 > For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 >
 >      Scott Douglas           [email protected]
 >      Mike Cantwell           [email protected]
 >
 > For policy questions, send mail to:
 >
 >      Jim Bacher:             [email protected]
 >      David Heald:            [email protected]
 >
 > All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
 >
 >     http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
 >

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
emc-pstc discussion list.    Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/

To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected]

Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html

List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:

     Scott Douglas           [email protected]
     Mike Cantwell           [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:

     Jim Bacher:             [email protected]
     David Heald:            [email protected]

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:

    http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
______________________________________________________________________

Reply via email to