In message <[email protected]>, dated Fri, 8 Sep 2006, [email protected] writes
>CISPR 11 is specifically for ISM RF equipment. It only applies to >equipment that intentionally radiates in the ISM bands and should not >therefore be quoted for other equipment. No, it doesn't only apply to intentional radiators. It applies to anything that uses radio-frequency energy, with, now, a very liberal definition of 'radio-frequency'. In fact, the scope is so ambiguous that it could be applied to almost anything. Steps are being taken to correct this. > >My point is that 61326-1:2005 calls (in my opinion, incorrectly) CISPR >11 for all equipment types, when it ought to be CISPR 16 for the >non-ISM stuff. I believe you are right; it sound like a simple typo with BIG consequences. Do we have anyone involved with IEC SC65A who can take this up? -- OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk There are benefits from being irrational - just ask the square root of 2. John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected] Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas [email protected] Mike Cantwell [email protected] For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: [email protected] David Heald: [email protected] All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc ______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email ______________________________________________________________________
