In message <p06240803c2118508598e@[192.168.1.17]>, dated Mon, 5 Mar 2007, Nick Williams <[email protected]> writes:
>It's rare that i would be so bold as to disagree with Mr Woodgate, but >on this occasion I will! You are disagreeing only partially, in fact. Besides, I claim only to know NEARLY everything. (;-) > >The rules are different for different directives. The Machinery >Directive requires each piece of machinery to be accompanied by a DofC >whereas this is not the case for the LVD and EMC Directives (IIRC) My recommendation avoids having to take all these illogical differences into account. Print it in the manual; cost $0.001. Value of reduction of hassle $1000. -- OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk There are benefits from being irrational - just ask the square root of 2. John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected] Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas [email protected] Mike Cantwell [email protected] For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: [email protected] David Heald: [email protected] All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc ______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email ______________________________________________________________________
