This is where it originated, the NFPA 70, 2001 Report on Proposals. The panel
came up with this substantial change to the section in response to the
submitted proposal (recommendation). No indication about why the bathroom
issue came up during the panel meeting, probably a desire to keep circuits
which cannot be turned off by any means (except covering the panels) away from
moist environments.

Bob Johnson
ITE Safety <http://www.itesafety.com> 

3- 182 - (690-14(c) (New) ): Accept in Principle
SUBMITTER: John C. Wiles, Jr., Southwest Tech. Development
Inst./Rep. Photovoltaic Power Industry Forum
RECOMMENDATION: Add new text to read:
β€œThe photovoltaic disconnecting means shall be grouped with other
disconnecting means for the system. A photovoltaic disconnecting means shall
not be required at the photovoltaic module or array location.”
SUBSTANTIATION: To comply with the code requirements for grouping all
disconnects of a power system in a single location, it is necessary to have
the photovoltaic disconnecting means grouped with the other disconnecting
means. Although photovoltaic modules and arrays may be located some distance
away or on the roof, there is no requirement for a disconnect at the source
because the source is energized in daylight whether or not the disconnect is
opened.
PANEL ACTION: Accept in Principle.
Add the following new text to the proposed text:
β€œ(c) Requirements for Disconnecting Means. Means shall be provided to
disconnect all conductors in a building or other structure from the
photovoltaic system conductors.
(1) Location. The photovoltaic disconnecting means shall be installed at a
readily accessible location either outside of a building or structure or
inside nearest the point of entrance of the system conductors.
The photovoltaic system disconnecting means shall not be installed in
bathrooms.
(2) Marking. Each photovoltaic system disconnecting means shall be permanently
marked to identify it as a photovoltaic system disconnect.
(3)Suitable for Use. Each photovoltaic system disconnecting means shall be
suitable for the prevailing conditions. Equipment installed in hazardous
(classified) locations shall comply with the requirements of Articles 500
through 517.
(4)Maximum Number of Disconnects. The photovoltaic system disconnecting means
shall consist of not more than six switches or six circuit breakers mounted in
a single enclosure, in a group of separate enclosures, or in or on a
switchboard.
(5)Grouping. The photovoltaic system disconnecting means shall be grouped with
other disconnecting means for the system to comply with (4). A photovoltaic
disconnecting means shall not be required at the photovoltaic module or array
location.”
PANEL STATEMENT: The added text was modified from Part F of Article 230 to
ensure that a means for disconnecting the photovoltaic system will exist at
the proper location, with the proper marking and suitability of use, and with
the proper maximum number of disconnecting means.
NUMBER OF PANEL MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 12
VOTE ON PANEL ACTION:
AFFIRMATIVE: 12

Powell, Doug wrote: 

Hello all,



I sometimes see or hear about provisions in safety standards that must

have very interesting backgrounds.  Here is one example that seems so

obvious I have to wonder if it is really needed.





NFPA 70-2005 Edition

Section 690.14 Additional Provisions. Photovoltaic disconnecting

(C) Requirements for Disconnecting Means

(1) Location - The photovoltaic system disconnecting means shall not be

installed in bathrooms.





Actually, there are several places in the standard where similar

language exists.  Outside of speculation, does anyone actually know the

historical background for this requirement?



Regards,



-doug



Douglas E. Powell

Senior Compliance Engineer

Corporate Compliance Department



Advanced Energy Industries, Inc.

Fort Collins, Colorado USA 80525



 





This message, including any attachments, may contain information

that is confidential and proprietary information of Advanced 

Energy Industries, Inc.  The dissemination, distribution, use 

or copying of this message or any of its attachments is 

strictly prohibited without the express written consent of 

Advanced Energy Industries, Inc.





-



This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society

emc-pstc discussion list.    Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/



To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected]



Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html



List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html



For help, send mail to the list administrators:



     Scott Douglas           [email protected]

     Mike Cantwell           [email protected]



For policy questions, send mail to:



     Jim Bacher:             [email protected]

     David Heald:            [email protected]



All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:



    http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc

  


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
______________________________________________________________________

- ---------------------------------------------------------------- This
message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ 

To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected] 


Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html 


List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 


For help, send mail to the list administrators: 


Scott Douglas [email protected] Mike Cantwell [email protected] 


For policy questions, send mail to: 


Jim Bacher: [email protected] David Heald: [email protected] 


All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: 


http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc 


Reply via email to