In message <[email protected]>, dated Mon, 26 Mar 2007, Jim Eichner <[email protected]> writes:
>It seems I am interpreting it correctly, and some other mfr's and >"competent" bodies are not. None of us is perfect, but careful reading >does give you the correct answer in this case so it's a bit frustrating. The trouble is that many standards don't actually say clearly what they mean, which leads to 'interpretations', some official but many unofficial, which come in three kinds, 'true', 'perhaps' and 'false'. When you are told of an 'interpretation', it may be very difficult to find out which kind you have! -- OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk There are benefits from being irrational - just ask the square root of 2. John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected] Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas [email protected] Mike Cantwell [email protected] For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: [email protected] David Heald: [email protected] All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc ______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email ______________________________________________________________________
