All of the SDRAM output drivers I have measured have impedances of around 20
ohms. Adding the 22 ohm resistor is the usual way to use these parts. If you
are driving into a matched system having a characteristic impedance of 50
ohms (and end terminated) you will reduce the driver current by 2 dB. Was
your reduction in EMI near this level? 


The dominant "antenna" can be the SDRAM package, or the PCB connector, or a
cable. It all depends on what your system is. The SDRAMs I have measured in
many applications all had highest emissions at multiples of the clock
frequency, most commonly the odd harmonics. Spread spectrum clocking seems
to have the best cost-benefit for reducing emissions. With a 1% spread in
your 59.9 MHz system the fundamental will be reduced 5 dB. Each harmonic is
reduced by 10LOG(H/F), H being the harmonic freq and F being the fundamental
freq. This assumes a 120 kHz measurement bandwidth. 

  Dave Cuthbert
  Linear Technology


From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
[email protected]
Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2007 7:13 AM
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Emission at SDRAM harmonics and ethernet signal current

Dear Experts,
      In our ethernet device, by introducing series resistors of value 22
ohms in the Tx / Rx signals we noticed reduction in the emission levels.
Reduction of emission in the ethernet harmonics (175, 200, 225, 250, 275,
300 & 350 MHz) is logical. At the same time we notice reduction of emission
in SDRAM clock harmonics also. (multiples of 59.9 MHz). Why & how this
happens and what to infer from this is not clear to us.

Sincerely

K.Balasubramanian
Project Leader - Hardware.

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
emc-pstc discussion list.    Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/

To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected]

Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html

List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:

     Scott Douglas           [email protected]
     Mike Cantwell           [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:

     Jim Bacher:             [email protected]
     David Heald:            [email protected]

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:

    http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
emc-pstc discussion list.    Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/

To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected]

Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html

List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:

     Scott Douglas           [email protected]
     Mike Cantwell           [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:

     Jim Bacher:             [email protected]
     David Heald:            [email protected]

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:

    http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
______________________________________________________________________

Reply via email to