In message <ofa779f4b4.d6a051f3-on652572c9.0052104d-652572c9.00523...@scmmicro.co.in >, dated Thu, 26 Apr 2007, [email protected] writes:
>Are mobile phones considered as receivers? If so then there is no place >on the earth without a mobile phone (receiver) which means there is no >Class A at all. Yes, another example of the problems with the concept of 'EMC environment'. This has given the mobile phone people some headaches. If your mobile phone reception is poor (due to low signal strength or interference), what do you do? Well all of us here would simply move to a different place, but the fear is that the non-technical user will just complain to the service provider. I'm not so sure: I think people are learning quite quickly. It is reported that one hotel in Scotland advises guests, 'Your mobile phone will work if you stand under the third tree on the left in the garden'. -- OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk There are benefits from being irrational - just ask the square root of 2. John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected] Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas [email protected] Mike Cantwell [email protected] For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: [email protected] David Heald: [email protected] All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc ______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email ______________________________________________________________________
