In message <[email protected]>, dated Thu, 14 
Jun 2007, Bob Richards <[email protected]> writes:

>No response from the first post, so I am reposting. Seems like the more 
>complicated the question, the more responses we get. This question must 
>be too simple. :-)

For me, the question is not sufficiently clear.
> 
>The GR1089 Conducted Immunity calibration is to be performed in a 50 
>ohm fixture, terminated on one side with 50ohms, the other side through 
>an attenuator (also 50ohm impedance) to a measurement device. The test 
>limit at 10khz is listed as 89 dBua. The calibration level, measured at 
>the output of the calibration fixture, should therefore be 123 dBuV ( 
>add 34 dB to convert from dBuA to dBuV in a 50 ohm system).  My 
>question is this: Is there is a 6 dB adjustment in level to be included 
>in the measurement?  

Please explain how you think this 6 dB adjustment should be applied. Do 
you mean that the test signal level should be increased (or decreased?) 
by 6 dB compared with the level used for calibration, or do you mean 
something quite different?
-- 
OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk
There are benefits from being irrational - just ask the square root of 2.
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
emc-pstc discussion list.    Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/

To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected]

Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html

List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:

     Scott Douglas           [email protected]
     Mike Cantwell           [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:

     Jim Bacher:             [email protected]
     David Heald:            [email protected]

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:

    http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
______________________________________________________________________

Reply via email to