In message , dated Sat, 21 Apr 2007, Brian Jones <[email protected]> writes:
>A crucial reason that ENs are required for basic standards is related >to dates of withdrawal. > >Where a basic standard is referenced as an undated reference from a >product family or generic standard, a new edition of the basic standard >would become effective immediately, were it not for the transition >period in the EN basic standard. True, but as I have pointed out before, there is no need to publish the whole standard as an EN just to establish a dow. That could be done with less than one page. -- OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk Murphy's Law has now been officially re-named The Certainty Principle John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected] Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas [email protected] Mike Cantwell [email protected] For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: [email protected] David Heald: [email protected] All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
