Calculation by itself doesn't make it inaccurate it's the near field to
distance relation which makes it invalid.

Best Regards
Lothar Schmidt
Director Regulatory & Antenna Services

CETECOM Inc. 
411 Dixon Landing Road
Milpitas, CA 95035
Phone +1 (408) 586 6214
Fax       +1 (408) 586 6299
email    [email protected]

This e-mail may contain proprietary, privileged and confidential information
for the sole use of the named intended recipient.  Any review
or distribution of this e-mail by any party other than the intended
recipient or that person's agent is strictly prohibited. If you are not the
intended recipient, please delete all copies and immediately contact the
sender. You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute,
print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended recipient.



From: Conway, Patrick R (Houston) [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2008 12:08 PM
To: Lothar Schmidt; Eugene Peyzner; Frank Krozel; [email protected];
[email protected]
Subject: RE: Cell Phone field strength

That was my thinking too, that they are calculated.
        But that does not necessarily make them inaccurate.
        They could be accurate by luck, we need more data in order to support
either position.

        Does anyone have contact info for the two authors?



Best Regards,

Patrick.
[email protected]



From: Lothar Schmidt [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2008 1:57 PM
To: Conway, Patrick R (Houston); Eugene Peyzner; Frank Krozel;
[email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Cell Phone field strength

If you look to these numbers they are certainly calculated and are certainly
not accurate in the near field.

Best Regards
Lothar Schmidt
Director Regulatory & Antenna Services

CETECOM Inc.
411 Dixon Landing Road
Milpitas, CA 95035
Phone +1 (408) 586 6214
Fax       +1 (408) 586 6299
email    [email protected]

This e-mail may contain proprietary, privileged and confidential information
for the sole use of the named intended recipient.  Any review or distribution
of this e-mail by any party other than the intended recipient or that person's
agent is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please
delete all copies and immediately contact the sender. You must not, directly
or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of this
message if you are not the intended recipient.



From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Conway,
Patrick R (Houston)
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2008 11:10 AM
To: Eugene Peyzner; Frank Krozel; [email protected];
[email protected]
Subject: RE: Cell Phone field strength

Thanks for the pointer to the Conformity article.

The table, Table 2, does not seem to have a reference of footnote describing
the source of the data.
        Does anyone know the source of that data?
        Is the data measured or calculated?



Best Regards,

Patrick.
[email protected]



From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Eugene Peyzner
Sent: Friday, March 14, 2008 8:59 PM
To: Frank Krozel; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Re: Cell Phone field strength

RF Field depends on cell phone type.

Check Table 2 in Ron Brewer and Dawn Trout article in Confirmity, July 1,
2007
http://www.conformity.com/artman/publish/article_204.shtml

Regards,
Eugene.



From: "Frank Krozel" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, March 14, 2008 7:35 AM
Subject: Re: Cell Phone field strength


> John, it has been a long time ago, but... I recall measuring
> 800Mhz/analog at about 12V/m at 1cm.
>
> Don't have any knowledge of newer ones.
>
> Regards, Frank Krozel
> http://www.electronicinstrument.com
> Tel: 630-924-1600
> PO Box 6487 <new>
> Bloomingdale, IL 60108
> Fax: 630-477-0321
> Serving the Midwest since 1971
> EMC MiniSymposium - http://www.emcchicago.org/sectfiles/events.htm
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Friday, March 14, 2008 9:17 AM
> Subject: Cell Phone field strength
>
>
>> Does anyone have good numbers for the RF Field strength from a hand
>> held Cell Phone at 1 cm distance?
>>
>> Thanks in advance
>>
>> John Merrill
>> Product Safety Engineer
>> Schneider Automation
>>
>> -
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>> This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
>> emc-pstc discussion list.    Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
>>
>> To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected]
>>
>> Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
>>
>> List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
>>
>> For help, send mail to the list administrators:
>>
>>     Scott Douglas           [email protected]
>>     Mike Cantwell           [email protected]
>>
>> For policy questions, send mail to:
>>
>>     Jim Bacher:             [email protected]
>>     David Heald:            [email protected]
>>
>> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
>>
>>    http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
>
> -
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
> emc-pstc discussion list.    Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
>
> To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected]
>
> Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
>
> List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
>
> For help, send mail to the list administrators:
>
>     Scott Douglas           [email protected]
>     Mike Cantwell           [email protected]
>
> For policy questions, send mail to:
>
>     Jim Bacher:             [email protected]
>     David Heald:            [email protected]
>
> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
>
>    http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
emc-pstc discussion list.    Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/

To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected]

Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html

List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:

     Scott Douglas           [email protected]
     Mike Cantwell           [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:

     Jim Bacher:             [email protected]
     David Heald:            [email protected]

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:

    http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
emc-pstc discussion list.    Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/

To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected]

Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html

List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:

     Scott Douglas           [email protected]
     Mike Cantwell           [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:

     Jim Bacher:             [email protected]
     David Heald:            [email protected]

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:

    http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
emc-pstc discussion list.    Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/

To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected]

Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html

List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:

     Scott Douglas           [email protected]
     Mike Cantwell           [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:

     Jim Bacher:             [email protected]
     David Heald:            [email protected]

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:

    http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc

Reply via email to