Richard
Thanks a lot for this exquisite and comprehensive response. These were my 
assumptions and rules as well 
Unfortunately, comments from marketing were: "why do you make our products to 
be at competitive disadvantage,  all of our competitors marking it at full 
rating on the sockets"

It was brought up in one of responses that UL allows you to print full ratings 
on the outlet. Are where any IEC or EN standards mentioning scenario like this?

 

Best Regards,
Mark Gandler

On Jan 27, 2011, at 2:17 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:



         
        Hi Mark:
         
         
        I understand that the equipment in question is a direct
        plug-in device.  It includes a socket-outlet that is 
        the same configuration as the socket-outlet in the wall.
         
        I understand two questions:
         
        1)  Should the rating of the equipment be included?
         
        2)  How should the socket-outlet be rated?
         
        In answer to question 1:  Yes, the rating of the
        equipment must be marked on the unit, e.g., 0.1 A.
        This is the current when nothing is plugged into the
        included socket-outlet.  (The plug configuration
        identifies the total current of the equipment and the
        included socket-outlet.)
         
        In answer to question 2:  The rating of the 
        socket-outlet must be marked on the unit.  However, 
        the sum of the equipment rating and the socket-outlet 
        rating cannot exceed the rating of the equipment plug 
        (which should be equal to the rating of the socket-
        outlet on the wall).  
         
        If your equipment is 0.1 A, and if the equipment
        provides a British standard 13 A socket-outlet, then 
        the socket-outlet must be marked as 12.9 A or less.
         
        I understand a third question:
         
        3)  Can a stand-alone socket-outlet be rated less
        than the rated current for that (standardized) 
        socket-outlet.  
         
        In answer to question 3:  A stand-alone socket-
        outlet must comply with the national standard for 
        that socket-outlet.  However, if the socket-outlet 
        is mounted on an equipment (by which it is no 
        longer stand-alone), the socket-outlet can be 
        marked with a rating that is less than the national 
        standard for that socket-outlet.  
         
         
        Best regards,
        Richard Nute
        Product Safety Consultant
        San Diego, California, USA  
         

                -----Original Message-----  
                From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
Mark Gandler
                Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2011 6:41 PM
                To: <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]
                Subject: Socket-outlet current rating on the direct plug-in 
equipment
                
                
                Hi, 
                
                
                if one to sell direct plug-in equipment with build-in socket 
outlet (air-freshener, night light) what would be appropriate current rating on 
the socket? Do you have to take into consideration current draw of the product 
itself, regardless of how small it could be, let's say 0.1A?
                
                
                For example, UK version, based on BS1363, maximum current is 
13A. Do you put 12.9A on the socket?  and if yes, how practical is it to expect 
the consumer will follow it to the dot? 
                
                
                In general, can standalone sold sockets be rated less than 
maximum allowed current in each country? do you ever encountered such sockets? 
                
                
                Thanks for the inputs any of the above,
                
                
                Mark

        -
        ----------------------------------------------------------------
        This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society 
emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to < 
<mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]>
        
        All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at 
<http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/> http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/
        Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to 
that URL. 

        Website: <http://www.ieee-pses.org/> http://www.ieee-pses.org/
        Instructions: <http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html> 
http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
        List rules: <http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html> 
http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

        For help, send mail to the list administrators:
        Scott Douglas < <mailto:[email protected]> 
[email protected]>
        Mike Cantwell < <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]> 

        For policy questions, send mail to:
        Jim Bacher < <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]>
        David Heald < <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]> 

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. 

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> 

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <[email protected]>
David Heald <[email protected]> 


Reply via email to