And the motor might well be series wound, and have electronic speed
control, as my hedge trimmers have. Lots of commutator and switching
noise.

Ed Price
[email protected]     WB6WSN
NARTE Certified EMC Engineer
Electromagnetic Compatibility Lab
Cubic Defense Applications
San Diego, CA  USA
858-505-2780
Military & Avionics EMC Is Our Specialty

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Arthur
> Michael
> Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 10:38 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [PSES] Test Standards for immunity to EMI from TIG and
MIG
> welders?
> 
> Hi All,
> 
> It's not unusual for a chain saw, electric or gas powered, to be held
> close to the upper torso during use. The same can be said for backpack
> mounted leaf blowers I suppose.
> 
> Other gas-powered devices (lawn mowers, weed whackers, etc) are
> typically
> used at quite some distance from the upper torso (I fervently hope).
> 
> Regards, Art
> 
> A.E. Michael, Dir. of Engineering
> Product Safety Int'l
> 166 Congdon St. East
> Middletown CT 06457-2107 U.S.A.
> 
> Phone  :  (860) 344-1651
> Fax    :  (860) 346-9066
> Email  :  [email protected]
> Website:  http://www.safetylink.com
> 
>
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
> ---
> 
> On Mon, 25 Oct 2010, [email protected] wrote:
> 
> > Electric chain saw?
> >
> >
> >
> > From:
> > "McInturff, Gary" <[email protected]>
> > To:
> > "[email protected]" <[email protected]>,
> > "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> > Date:
> > 10/25/2010 09:26 AM
> > Subject:
> > RE: [PSES] Test Standards for immunity to EMI from TIG and MIG
> welders?
> > Sent by:
> > [email protected]
> >
> >
> >
> > The medical article is interesting reading in a couple of spots -
> magnetic
> > fields are noted several places - electric tooth brushes being one
of
> > them.
> >
> > Although I don't know that they went far enough - at least in the
> > following case
> >
> > "Chain Saws - Recommend maintaining at least 12 inches (30 cm)
> separation
> > between the motor and the implant device".
> >
> > Maybe they should add that the cutting bar is 18 inches and should
be
> > pointed the other direction :)
> >
> > Why would a chain saw be any more problematic than any small gas
> powered
> > engine?
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Pat Lawler [mailto:[email protected]]
> > Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 9:05 AM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: [PSES] Test Standards for immunity to EMI from TIG and
> MIG
> > welders?
> >
> >> From <
> >
>
http://www.med.unc.edu/medicine/card/fellows/patientinstructions/EMI.pd
> f>
> > :
> >
> > "Note: If you have an ICD [Implantable Cardiac Defibrillator], some
> strong
> >
> > magnetic fields may cause
> > your device to make beeping tones."
> >
> > Wow - I hope patients know about the possibility of beeping!  If I
> didn't
> > know, and my chest started beeping, I think I'd have a heart attack.
> >
> > Pat Lawler
> > EMC Engineer
> > SL Power Electronics Corp.
> >
> > [email protected] wrote on 10/22/2010 03:12:53 PM:
> >> Page 4 of
> >>
>
http://www.med.unc.edu/medicine/card/fellows/patientinstructions/EMI.pd
> f
> >> has some welding specific guidelines but no references as to where
> the
> >> numbers came from.  I'd ask the source ( www.guidant.com ) what
> studies
> >> back up their assertions.  Also see
> >> http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1279591 and
> >>
> >
>
http://samplecode.rockwellautomation.com/idc/groups/literature/document
> s/
> >> wp/nets-wp002_-en-p.pdf .
> >>
> >> Orin
> >
> >> On Fri, 22 Oct 2010 13:48:39 -0700 [email protected] writes:
> >>> Though I have seen lots of mentions of electromagnetic emissions
by
> >>> welding equipment in the web searches I have done, I have seen no
> >>> quantitative measurements.
> >>>
> >>> The only indirect indication of the level of emissions is the
> >>> immunity
> >>> levels called out in IEC 60974-10 (10 V/m as per IEC 61000-4-3,
> >>> which our
> >>> equipment meets as well). But my guess is that this test is nearly
> >>> redundant for the equipment manufacturers, since I expect the
level
> >>> of
> >>> emissions produced during welding to be as much if not more of a
> >>> problem.
> >>>
> >>> Donald Borowski
> >>> Schweitzer Engineering Labs
> >>> Pullman, Washington, USA
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> From:
> >>> John Woodgate <[email protected]>
> >>> To:
> >>> [email protected]
> >>> Date:
> >>> 10/22/2010 01:37 PM
> >>> Subject:
> >>> Re: Test Standards for immunity to EMI from TIG and MIG welders?
> >>> Sent by:
> >>> [email protected]
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> In message
> >>>
> > <OFB20EB02E.CE4C32E9-ON882577C4.0061E8F4-
> [email protected]>,
> >
> >>>
> >>> dated Fri, 22 Oct 2010, [email protected] writes:
> >>>
> >>>> So my last (and now most important) question is: Is there any
> >>>> literature describing the electromagnetic environment around TIG
> >>> and
> >>>> MIG welders while in operation in the field?
> >>>
> >>> I'm sorry that the IEC standard was inadequate. It's true that the
> >>> welding process in inherently subject to large variations in
almost
> >>>
> >>> every characteristic.
> >>>
> >>> I looked at standards related to exposure to EMF from arc welding
> >>> equipment, (such as EN 50444) but I did not find any description
of
> >>> the
> >>> environment.
> >>> --
> >>> OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and
> >>> www.isce.org.uk
> >>> John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK
> >>> If at first you don't succeed, delegate.
> >>> But I support unbloated email http://www.asciiribbon.org/
> >>>
> >>> -
> >
> > -
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
emc-
> pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail
> to <[email protected]>
> >
> > All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
> > http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
> > Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to
> that URL.
> >
> > Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
> > Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
> > List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
> > For help, send mail to the list administrators:
> > Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
> > Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>
> >
> > For policy questions, send mail to:
> > Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
> > David Heald: <[email protected]>
> >
> 
> -
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-
> pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail
> to <[email protected]>
> 
> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
> http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
> Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to
> that URL.
> 
> Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
> Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
> List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
> 
> For help, send mail to the list administrators:
> Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
> Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>
> 
> For policy questions, send mail to:
> Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
> David Heald: <[email protected]>

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>

Reply via email to