Hi all,

It's not unusual for a chain saw, electric or gas powered, to be held 
close to the upper torso during use. The same can be said for backpack 
mounted leaf blowers I suppose. Lots of arcing occurs at the 
brush/commutator interface.

Regards, Art

A.E. Michael, Dir. of Engineering
Product Safety Int'l
166 Congdon St. East
Middletown CT 06457-2107 U.S.A.

Phone  :  (860) 344-1651
Fax    :  (860) 346-9066
Email  :  [email protected]
Website:  http://www.safetylink.com

====================================================

On Mon, 25 Oct 2010, [email protected] wrote:

> Electric chain saw?
>
>
>
> From:
> "McInturff, Gary" <[email protected]>
> To:
> "[email protected]" <[email protected]>,
> "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> Date:
> 10/25/2010 09:26 AM
> Subject:
> RE: [PSES] Test Standards for immunity to EMI from TIG and MIG welders?
> Sent by:
> [email protected]
>
>
>
> The medical article is interesting reading in a couple of spots - magnetic
> fields are noted several places - electric tooth brushes being one of
> them.
>
> Although I don't know that they went far enough - at least in the
> following case
>
> "Chain Saws - Recommend maintaining at least 12 inches (30 cm) separation
> between the motor and the implant device".
>
> Maybe they should add that the cutting bar is 18 inches and should be
> pointed the other direction :)
>
> Why would a chain saw be any more problematic than any small gas powered
> engine?
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pat Lawler [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 9:05 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [PSES] Test Standards for immunity to EMI from TIG and MIG
> welders?
>
>> From <
> http://www.med.unc.edu/medicine/card/fellows/patientinstructions/EMI.pdf>
> :
>
> "Note: If you have an ICD [Implantable Cardiac Defibrillator], some strong
>
> magnetic fields may cause
> your device to make beeping tones."
>
> Wow - I hope patients know about the possibility of beeping!  If I didn't
> know, and my chest started beeping, I think I'd have a heart attack.
>
> Pat Lawler
> EMC Engineer
> SL Power Electronics Corp.
>
> [email protected] wrote on 10/22/2010 03:12:53 PM:
>> Page 4 of
>> http://www.med.unc.edu/medicine/card/fellows/patientinstructions/EMI.pdf
>> has some welding specific guidelines but no references as to where the
>> numbers came from.  I'd ask the source ( www.guidant.com ) what studies
>> back up their assertions.  Also see
>> http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1279591 and
>>
> http://samplecode.rockwellautomation.com/idc/groups/literature/documents/
>> wp/nets-wp002_-en-p.pdf .
>>
>> Orin
>
>> On Fri, 22 Oct 2010 13:48:39 -0700 [email protected] writes:
>>> Though I have seen lots of mentions of electromagnetic emissions by
>>> welding equipment in the web searches I have done, I have seen no
>>> quantitative measurements.
>>>
>>> The only indirect indication of the level of emissions is the
>>> immunity
>>> levels called out in IEC 60974-10 (10 V/m as per IEC 61000-4-3,
>>> which our
>>> equipment meets as well). But my guess is that this test is nearly
>>> redundant for the equipment manufacturers, since I expect the level
>>> of
>>> emissions produced during welding to be as much if not more of a
>>> problem.
>>>
>>> Donald Borowski
>>> Schweitzer Engineering Labs
>>> Pullman, Washington, USA
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> From:
>>> John Woodgate <[email protected]>
>>> To:
>>> [email protected]
>>> Date:
>>> 10/22/2010 01:37 PM
>>> Subject:
>>> Re: Test Standards for immunity to EMI from TIG and MIG welders?
>>> Sent by:
>>> [email protected]
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> In message
>>>
> <ofb20eb02e.ce4c32e9-on882577c4.0061e8f4-882577c4.00638...@selinc.com>,
>
>>>
>>> dated Fri, 22 Oct 2010, [email protected] writes:
>>>
>>>> So my last (and now most important) question is: Is there any
>>>> literature describing the electromagnetic environment around TIG
>>> and
>>>> MIG welders while in operation in the field?
>>>
>>> I'm sorry that the IEC standard was inadequate. It's true that the
>>> welding process in inherently subject to large variations in almost
>>>
>>> every characteristic.
>>>
>>> I looked at standards related to exposure to EMF from arc welding
>>> equipment, (such as EN 50444) but I did not find any description of
>>> the
>>> environment.
>>> --
>>> OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and
>>> www.isce.org.uk
>>> John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK
>>> If at first you don't succeed, delegate.
>>> But I support unbloated email http://www.asciiribbon.org/
>>>
>>> -
>
> -
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<[email protected]>
>
> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
> http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
> Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL.
>
> Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
> Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
> List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
> For help, send mail to the list administrators:
> Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
> Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>
>
> For policy questions, send mail to:
> Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
> David Heald: <[email protected]>
>

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>

Reply via email to