yes, that was one of the issues. > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of > [email protected] > Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2010 11:20 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: [PSES] IEC 60950-1 vs IEC 60601-1 > > Brian, > > You wrote: > > I have recent experience where a CPS with a 60601 > > report, and tested for patient contact, was installed in ITE. The > > box could no longer pass all safety requirements for a C.O. device. > > 'C.O. device' -- 'Central Office'? Does this means the > medical power > supply was subjected to Bellcore/Verizon-style telecomm > system tests? > > Pat Lawler > EMC Engineer > SL Power Electronics Corp.
- ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <[email protected]> Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: <[email protected]> David Heald: <[email protected]>
