looks like some of your messages are taking 9 hours to post on this list.

any reason for this filter delay?

Christopher



--- On Tue, 5/20/08, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:


        From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
        Subject: Re: 61000-4-11 Inrush current
        To: [email protected], [email protected]
        Date: Tuesday, May 20, 2008, 11:00 AM
        
        

        Hi Bob: 
        
        I have a copy of IEC61000-4-11:1994.  Take another look at clause 
6.1.1.   
        It says the peak inrush current drive capability '... need not exceed 
500A
for 220V-240V mains,  or 250A for 100V-120V mains.' 
        
        For a minimum capability, look at clause 6.2.2.  It says that 'the 
measured
EUT peak inrush current shall be less than 70% of the peak current drive
capability of the generator, ...' 
             Ipk.EUT  <  70% * Ipk.generator 
        Solving for Ipk.generator gives: 
             Ipk.EUT * 143%  <  Ipk.generator 
        Note the special test conditions for measuring the EUT peak inrush 
current in
Annex A. 
        
        So your generator needs to be capable of a peak current between  
Ipk.EUT *
143%  and 500A. 
        
        As far as your 'AC fault' information is concerned, ask your associate 
where
it is documented. 
        
        Pat Lawler
        EMC Engineer
        SL Power Electronics Corp.
        
        [email protected] wrote on 05/20/2008 05:11:26 AM:
        > A question came up recently where I work about the current 
        > requirements of the AC source used for testing voltage dips and 
        > interrupts. I was told the scope of the standard is for products up 
to 16A
and that *includes* inrush current during turn-on.
        
        > I referenced table 6.1.1 where the peak inrush current capability 
must be
500A for 200 - 240v mains voltage, but was told this table only covers AC
fault conditions, not normal operations (including turn-on).
        
        > Since one of the tests is a >95% interruption for 5 seconds, would 
this be
considered an AC fault, or a normal turn-on for the EUT? 
        > Appendix A sure makes it sound like the inrush requirement is for the
power-up of the EUT. - ----------------
----------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE
Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. Website:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/ 

        To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected] 

        Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html 

        List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

        For help, send mail to the list administrators: 

        Scott Douglas [email protected] Mike Cantwell [email protected] 

        For policy questions, send mail to: 

        Jim Bacher: [email protected] David Heald: [email protected] 

        All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: 


- ---------------------------------------------------------------- This
message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ 

To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected] 

Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html 

List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators: 

Scott Douglas [email protected] Mike Cantwell [email protected] 

For policy questions, send mail to: 

Jim Bacher: [email protected] David Heald: [email protected] 

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: 

http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc 

Reply via email to