I am not aware of any IT or A/V safety standards that have
rework/repair site requirements; control of RMA services are
typically determined by the agency that has granted product
certification.

The OP specified the UL standard. If UL was the NRTL or NB, then
UL has specific requirements for repair centers (which may be
subject to site certifications and FUS audits). Rework / repair /
production requirements are typically specified in the Section
General and/or the UL file section for the respective product.

luck,
Brian


From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of
[email protected]
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2008 12:04 AM
To: 'Scott Douglas'; 'EMC PSTC'
Subject: RE: Hi pot on Customer Repairs

Hi Scott:

I don't know of any regulations or standards
that require hi-pot testing after repair.

My advice to my clients is to hi-pot test if
the primary circuits have been disturbed in
any way.  If repairs were to secondary
circuits, then hi-pot is not necessary.

However, repair centers seem to like
consistency, so they impose hi-pot tests on
all repaired equipment.

Hi-pot after repair means that the unit is
likely to have 2 hi-pots at that point in
its lifetime.  The small number of repeated
tests will have no detectable degradation
consequences to the insulations.

Note that some businesses require periodic
safety tests on their equipment, including
hi-pot.  I'm not aware of any early hi-pot
failures in such situations.

Same comments apply to the grounding
continuity test.


Best regards,
Richard Nute
Product Safety Consultant
San Diego



> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
> Of Scott Douglas
> Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2008 5:46 PM
> To: 'EMC PSTC'
> Subject: Hi pot on Customer Repairs
>
> For equipment under EN/UL 60065, when a customer product
> comes back for
> repair and after the repair is complete, is there any
> requirement that
> the unit have hi pot and ground continuity done before
> returning it to
> the customer? These are Class I products requiring a Protective
Earth
> connection. If there is a requirement, can you point me to
> the specific
> reference?
>
> Thanks in advance for any and all comments.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Scott Douglas
> [email protected]

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
emc-pstc discussion list.    Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/

To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected]

Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html

List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:

     Scott Douglas           [email protected]
     Mike Cantwell           [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:

     Jim Bacher:             [email protected]
     David Heald:            [email protected]

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:

    http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc



Reply via email to