Alan,

 

In the US the best-known university programs in EMC may be The Missouri School
of Science & Technology (formerly U. of Missouri- Rolla) and Clemson, but
there are other schools with programs or classes in one or more aspects of
EMC.  From my vantage point, these programs offer from among following topics:
(1) printed circuit board noise mechanisms (power bus, etc.); automotive EMC;
and (3) other (shielding, cables, ESD, etc.).  

 

A lot of emphasis in academia (worldwide) is in the arena of modeling.  A lot
of graduate students that are pursuing advanced degrees are modeling various
EMC or EM issues with various methods and tools.  This is an arena in which
academia has a lot to offer and they find it attractive.  Signal integrity
studies go hand in hand with printed circuit board noise suppression topics
and modeling.  A number of schools will offer modeling to graduate students
even if they don’t have a full curriculum in EMC topics.  

 

A few schools are offering automotive EMC programs since there has been a need
and funding sources to support this topic.  Academic programs that extend
beyond a few classes in an overall electrical engineering curriculum require
outside funding, either from industry or the government.  

 

Successful programs, such as the Missouri case, have been driven by (1)
technology, i.e., high-speed signaling; (2) requirements (more so by basic
emissions requirements rather than by the EU’s immunity requirements); (3)
by industry needs that are driven by requirements (need to fix a vexing
problem for the future, but industry does not have manpower/time to study it
themselves); and usually later in time by (4) government wanting to fund the
dissemination of this knowledge to other educational channels.

 

The successful academic program is one that is timely in offering this
expertise to industry (some luck in being at the right place at the right
time), able so solve knotty problems in detail so as to offer help in future
designs (provide a benefit to industry), able to attract a steady influx of
good students to do the work, and successfully market the program by
publishing papers and presenting at conferences.  Government interest or
understanding of the need for this sort of education is usually late to the
table.

 

Jim

 

__________________________ 

James L. Knighten, Ph.D. 
EMC Engineer 
Teradata Corporation 
17095 Via Del Campo 
San Diego, CA 92127 

858-485-2537 – phone 
858-485-3788 – fax (unattended) 





________________________________

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Alan E Hutley
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2008 7:19 AM
To: EMC-PSTC
Subject: EMC Eduction and Training

 

Hello All

 

I recently posted a request for information on Universities that offer EMC
Educational activities. I thank those that responded but was very surprised by
the very small number of Universities involved. I would like therefore to
widen the debate.

 

EMC Education and Training

Behind EMC lays the Technology and Science of Electromagnetism, Signal
Integrity and RF Engineering... EMC is a by-product of these disciplines. Over
the past dozen or so years EMC has been largely, if not entirely, driven by
Directives and Regulations. Around this scenario has evolved a specialised
product industry together with consultants and soothsayers.

Without the furore of this activity, EMC would almost certainly not have been
on the RADAR to the extent that it has been. Could this be the reason why
formal qualifications and academic training has not evolved at the same pace
or magnitude?

 Is the apparent lack of resources committed to Training and Education due to
the relevant organisations and Governments lack of understanding with respect
to the complexity surrounding EMC... or are there other reasons.

Invariably, or at least in many cases, Engineers seem to have ended up
becoming EMC Engineers by default, not design. Does anyone actually set out
with the sole purpose of becoming an EMC Engineer?  Did you?

I am interested in the views of others and finding out what resources are
currently available, plus I would like to hear from Trainers, Educators,
Course Presenters, EMC Engineers, Consultants and anyone else that can
contribute to the debate by expressing their opinions.

Thank you.

 

Alan E Hutley

The EMC Journal

www.theemcjournal.com

 

 

 

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. 

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> 

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <[email protected]>
David Heald <[email protected]> 

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. 

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> 

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <[email protected]>
David Heald <[email protected]> 


Reply via email to