In message <[email protected]>, dated Tue, 15 Jun 2010, Brian O'Connell <[email protected]> writes:
>The 'big issue' on which I would like to hear your opinion is if any of >the reliability models were able to actually indicate relative >lifetimes and/or failure rates of systems or components for a defined >environment. We are in many areas getting to the point where reliability is in general so good that they can't. Once single-instance random defects predominate in the causes of failure, statistical control methods can no longer work. -- OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK I should be disillusioned, but it's not worth the effort. - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <[email protected]> Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: <[email protected]> David Heald: <[email protected]>
