I have used the tester and find it takes a pretty sharp edge to fail. The 
primary benefit of the tester is that it settles the argument. If an edge 
passes the test UL will accept it. If it fails you had better address the 
issue. Internally, I have judged some edges a hazard and insisted on 
improvements even knowing they would pass. Most engineers are unaware of the 
tester and will follow the direction of the product safety engineer. As with a 
lot of product safety situations, good judgement on the part of the product 
safety engineer is important in spite of the wording in the standard.

Bob Johnson

Richard Pittenger wrote: 

        Peter and Forum,

         

        This discussion brings back some old memories for me. I worked at UL 
back in the 1970’s and shared a cubicle at that time with the engineer that 
developed the sharp edge tester. Peter’s comments pretty well summarizes the 
reasoning behind the development of the tester as a way to put more objectivity 
into the determination of whether or not an edge is too sharp. 

         

        I can’t comment whether or not the tester fully achieved its goal and 
purpose but I do know that a lot of time and effort went in to its development. 

         

        Good day,

         

        Richard I. Pittenger

        Agency Approval Engineer

        Food Retail Systems

        Hobart

        From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of peter 
merguerian
        Sent: Friday, February 12, 2010 12:30 AM
        To: [email protected]; sudhakar wasnik
        Cc: [email protected]
        Subject: Re: UL 1439 standard genesis

         

Sudhakar,

 

Many UL Standards call out "an edge, projection, or corner of an enclosure, 
opening, frame, guard, knob, handle, or the like, shall be smooth, well 
rounded, and not sufficiently sharp to constitute a hazard.” Manufacturers had 
no way to determine what constitutes a smooth, well rounded and not 
sufficiently sharp edge. UL developed the UL 1439 standard many years ago as a 
means to determine acceptability of a sharp edge. I believe today UL1439 is 
referenced in many of the UL standards.

 

Best Regards,

 

Peter Merguerian

Go Global Compliance

4454 Crabapple Ct

Tracy, CA 95377

 

Tel: (925) 487-4640

E-Mail: [email protected]



--- On Thu, 2/11/10, sudhakar wasnik <[email protected]> 
<mailto:[email protected]>  wrote:

        
        From: sudhakar wasnik <[email protected]> 
<mailto:[email protected]> 
        Subject: UL 1439 standard genesis
        To: [email protected]
        Date: Thursday, February 11, 2010, 1:49 PM

Hi Guys,  

Can some one  in the group shade some light on origin of this UL 1439 sharp 
edge standard?

 

Does this standard have any basic standard like ANSI or any other on which this 
standard has evolved or is this evolution was by itself?

 

Thanks, 

 

Sudhakar Wasnik, 

        
        -
        ----------------------------------------------------------------
        This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society 
emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<[email protected]>
        
        All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at 
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc 
<http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc> 
        Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to 
that URL. 

        Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ <http://www.ieee-pses.org/> 
        Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html 
<http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html> 
        List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

        For help, send mail to the list administrators:
        Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
        Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> 

        For policy questions, send mail to:
        Jim Bacher <[email protected]>
        David Heald <[email protected]> 

        
        -
        ----------------------------------------------------------------
        This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society 
emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<[email protected]>
        
        All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at 
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc 
<http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc> 
        Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to 
that URL. 

        Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
        Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
        List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

        For help, send mail to the list administrators:
        Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
        Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> 

        For policy questions, send mail to:
        Jim Bacher <[email protected]>
        David Heald <[email protected]> 


________________________________

        Disclaimer - This email and any files transmitted with it are 
confidential and contain privileged or copyrighted information. You must not 
present this message to another party without first gaining permission from the 
sender. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not copy, print, 
distribute or use this email or the information contained in it for any purpose 
other than to notify us.
        
        If you received this email in error, please notify the sender 
immediately and delete this email from your system. We do not guarantee that 
this email is free from viruses or any other defects although due care has been 
taken to minimize the risk.
        

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at 
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. 

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> 

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <[email protected]>
David Heald <[email protected]> 


Reply via email to