In message <769907F0D19EFA45BD6F04FC6E896D6D220970D2C3@GVW0538EXC.americas.hpqcorp.n et>, dated Wed, 6 Jan 2010, "Conway, Patrick R (bNB Houston)" <[email protected]> writes:
>Exchanging components of the EUT System is a classic method to identify >which component is contributing to the fault. Yes, IF there is a single culprit. But with EMC, and especially ESD, there may well be no single culprit; the problem affects particular combinations of components and not others. If EMC was too easy, it wouldn't be so fascinating. -- OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK I should be disillusioned, but it's not worth the effort. - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <[email protected]> Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: <[email protected]> David Heald: <[email protected]>
