In message <690230e9cf51aa4ebf639fae9216d5b166e...@mer2-exchrec1.echostar.com>, dated Thu, 29 Oct 2009, "Grasso, Charles" <[email protected]> writes:
>There IS a difference between the two scenarios that you lay out John. >On the one hand you (or your company) assembles a number of products >into a rack for a specific function and that function is internal. > >On the other hand you have a manufacturer who decides (with the exact >same set of products) to place that solution on the market. If the >manufacturer markets that solution (with a Model number or equivalent) >then the manufacturer is responsible for the EMC/Safety of said system. How many more times do I have to explain? What you say is correct for a 'marketed' collection of products (offered as a catalogue item, invoiced as one item of commerce). I explained that a ***CUSTOM*** assembly does not need to be tested as an assembly. Please read the messages carefully. -- OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK Help stamp out intolerance! - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <[email protected]> Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: <[email protected]> David Heald: <[email protected]>
