In message <006401ca58b8$1b179ec0$5146dc40$@com>, dated Thu, 29 Oct 2009, Dennis Ward <[email protected]> writes:
>However, if a company has this great little idea of selling the same 5 >PCs and 5 cell phones devices connected all together in a 'rack', it is >extremely naïve of them to think that just because one PC and one cell >phone device 'meet the essential requirements' that all components in >the rack operating together would be compliant as well. While they may >be able to circumvent the reality of the EMC problem by saying >CE+CE=CE, they forget their responsibility that what they sell is to >be compliant. Please understand the difference between composite products offered by a manufacturer and custom assemblies made to the purchaser's specification. -- OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK Help stamp out intolerance! - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <[email protected]> Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: <[email protected]> David Heald: <[email protected]>
