Hi All,

I was a little too tied up to respond to this when it was first posted, 
but I feel I should. First off... a bias warning.... I have a history 
with Teseq's C3 software. OTOH, I have written and used EMC software for 
about 30 years now.

So, knowing most packages out there, I still feel Teseq's C3 is the 
leader, especially the immunity package. Not only is it compliant to the 
latest standards, but it's a standardized package. What this means is 
that a problem fixed in an installation somewhere gets fixed in yours 
automatically next release. It's released consistently to add features, 
stay current and yep, fix the odd bug.

C3 was written by Software writers under guidance from many EMC 
engineers and not EMC engineers playing software writer. There is a big 
difference. For those that like to write their own code, you have the 
flexibility to write your own test methods.

A very neat feature is an area where you can easily interface with what 
ever is being tested for closed loop testing.

While not formally announced by the factory, a complete rewrite of the 
emissions and immunity packages called C5 should be released early next 
year. For some reason C4 is being skipped :-).

If you have specific engineering questions feel free to ask me off list.

Cheers,

Derek Walton
L F Research


Kate Savo wrote:
>
> Hi Ted,
>
> This question was posted on /Interference Technology’s/ Testing Forum, 
> and received a few replies. To view the reply, please visit the link 
> below.
>
> http://www.interferencetechnology.com
technologies/testing/forums.html?tx_mmf
rum_pi1%5Baction%5D=list_post&tx_mmforum_pi1%5Btid%5D=157 
> <http://www.interferencetechnology.co
/technologies/testing/forums.html?tx_mm
orum_pi1%5Baction%5D=list_post&tx_mmforum_pi1%5Btid%5D=157>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Kate Savo
>
> /Interference Technology Forums Editor/
>
> www.interferencetechnology.com/ <http://www.interferencetechnology.com/>
>
> 484-688-0300 ext 26
>
> [email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>//
>
> *From:* Ted Eckert [mailto:[email protected]]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, September 29, 2009 6:07 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* [PSES] Radiated Immunity Software
>
> We are looking for a good software package for performing Radiated 
> Immunity testing to IEC 61000-4-3 in our own in-house anechoic 
> chamber. We are currently looking at software from Amplifier Research, 
> Teseq & TDK. Would anybody be able to recommend other software worth 
> evaluating? Do you have any comments about any of these programs?
>
> Thank you,
>
> Ted Eckert
>
> Compliance Engineer
>
> One Microsoft Way
>
> Redmond WA, 98052
>
> (425) 707-9205
>
> [email protected]
>
> This email message may contain confidential and proprietary 
> information. Any unauthorized use is prohibited. If you are not the 
> intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and 
> destroy all copies of the original message.
>
> -
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society 
> emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your 
> e-mail to <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>
> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at 
> http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
> Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to 
> that URL.
>
> Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
> Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
> List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
>
> For help, send mail to the list administrators:
> Scott Douglas <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
> Mike Cantwell <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>
> For policy questions, send mail to:
> Jim Bacher <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
> David Heald <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>
> -
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society 
> emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your 
> e-mail to <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>
> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at 
> http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
> Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to 
> that URL.
>
> Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
> Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
> List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
>
> For help, send mail to the list administrators:
> Scott Douglas <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
> Mike Cantwell <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>
> For policy questions, send mail to:
> Jim Bacher <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
> David Heald <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>

Reply via email to