Everyone

This issue has been discussed in the CENELEC EMC committee, TC210, leading
to guidance that I expect will be published in an updated CENELEC Guide 25.
The relevant text reads as follows.


"In some cases, a harmonised standard will make reference by dated reference
to another harmonised standard, each standard being listed in the OJEU for
the EMC Directive. In such cases, the specific edition of the referenced EN
is to be applied irrespective of whether that edition is currently listed in
the OJEU. This follows the principle that the primary standard provides the
requirements for the apparatus, and hence presumption of conformity in
respect of the EMC Directive as described in Annex ZZ of that standard (see
Annex 5 of this guide).  See also 2(e) below for the specific example where
the standards are based on international versions.

....

2(e) In some cases, a harmonised standard (described as the "primary"
standard below) may give a dated reference to another harmonised standard
(for example EN 61000-6-3:2007 makes reference to EN 55022:2006 for test
methods). It will be appreciated that the referenced standard is listed in
the OJEU in its own right, and the question arises as to whether the dated
reference, or the date of cessation of presumption of conformity given in
the OJEU list, should prevail.

The principle to be followed is that the dates given in Annex ZA of the
primary
product/product family/generic standard prevail. The committee responsible
for the
primary harmonised standard sets the total requirements, and this includes
the specific editions of referenced standards to be used.

The principle of the application of dated references is the same whether the
referenced standard is a basic standard or a product family standard."


It is expected that this text will be approved at the next Technical Board
meeting in November, and published shortly thereafter. 

Current versions of this Guide (and Guide 24) may be downloaded free of
charge at
http://www.cenelec.eu/Cenelec/CENELEC+in+action/Horizontal+areas/EMC/default
.htm 

The CENELEC website will show when the new editions of Guides 24 and 25 are
available.

Best wishes

Brian  

Brian Jones
EMC Consultant
Secretary CENELEC TC210





From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Spencer,
David H
Sent: 02 October 2009 13:10
To: John Woodgate; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Mains harmonics & flicker test equipment

Somewhat  hypothetical Q:

In the case of EN61236-1  where the Harmonics and Flicker requirements
call out dated standards (EN61000-3-2:2000).  The Official Journal lists
EN61000-3-2:2006.

"IF" there was a dramatic change between the two,  for a  proper DoC
would both versions need to be applied? 

Regards

Dave



From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of John
Woodgate
Sent: Friday, October 02, 2009 5:20 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Mains harmonics & flicker test equipment

In message 
<2AA8A4298DECF8469C66C8F3A2B9589201E391AB@GB02QEX01PEDV27.rmhost1.local>
, 
dated Fri, 2 Oct 2009, "Gordon,Ian" <[email protected]> 
writes:

>By "our" product standard I do mean the one we cite on D of Cs issued 
>by my employer. Whilst dated references should be updated the fact is 
>that if they do refer to older versions of standards then so be it. 
>That's why I acknowledge that when EN61326-1 goes through its next 
>revision it probably will refer to later versions although because of 
>the length of time taken to revise standards the dated references given

>then they will probably be "out of date" as well.

That's what IEC is working on. There is a proposal that committee 
secretaries review all normative references (particularly in standards 
used in a regulatory context) annually to se if they need updating. I am

not describing the whole procedure because it's still under discussion, 
but steps will be taken in any system that is introduced to make the 
process as easy and swift as possible.
-- 
OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk
Things can always get better. But that's not the only option.
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your
e-mail to <[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that
URL.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that
URL.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>

Reply via email to