In message <8fe3816af82d194db98d7451040bd58a05798...@mer2-excha2.echostar.com>, dated Thu, 10 Sep 2009, "Grasso, Charles" <[email protected]> writes:
>Trying to predict the *future* use of a product (i.e ? outside of its >intended use) opens up >Pandoras box. There is a difference in kind between 'future' and 'intended'. The manufacturer can only be responsible for 'intended use'. But that may well include future uses, that are not the first use made of the product, which the manufacturer probably won't know about, anyway. -- OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk Things can always get better. But that's not the only option. John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <[email protected]> Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: <[email protected]> David Heald: <[email protected]>
