There's no end to the dangers around us.  I recently purchased a spray 
nozzle for a garden hose, and it had a label saying:
"CAUTION: 
Shock Hazard: Do not spray near electricity. 
Detach from faucet during freezing weather. 
This product intended for outdoor watering only. 
Do not use with water exceeding 38degC or with pressures exceeding 60 
psi."

I took it back - I don't feel qualified to use it.  Besides, I wanted a 
spray nozzle to water the plants in my living room.  : )

Pat Lawler
EMC Engineer
SL Power Electronics Corp.

[email protected] wrote on 07/31/2009 03:56:10 AM:

> I expect shortly someone will need me to affix an  A4 paper at my 
> monitor saying "Monitor screen. Read here what computer  tells you."
>  
> Best Regards
> Piotr Galka
> MicroMade
> Poland
>  
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: Flavin, John 
> To: [email protected] 
> Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2009 7:56  PM
> Subject: Workplace Safety Rules
> 
> I like to know this group's experiences regarding  the following, 
> which has been put into my lap to resolve. 
> 
> Our plant manager recently arranged a class on  electrical safety 
> (based on OSHA regulations and the NFPA 70E standard) for  our 
> engineering staff who work in all of our labs. The instructor was 
> given a  tour of our facility, including our Safety and EMI labs 
> (due to the large size  and power requirements of our products, we 
> have our own safety and EMI  labs.  Safety testing is  witnessed by 
> a test engineer from an  outside lab, which writes the CB reports 
> for us; our EMI lab is NVLAP  accreditted). 
> 
> During the course of the class, the instructor  showed several 
> "examples" of items taken from both these labs as possible  items 
> which were "unsafe". For example, he showed a power cord which had a
> section of the outer insulation stripped off, so that the individual
> insulated  conductors were visible, and asked if this was safe. (How
> else do you put a  current clamp around one conductor in a 3phase, 5
> wire cord?). Our plant  manager wanted to know why a 32A pin and 
> sleeve connector with the appropriate  HAR cordage (which we use 
> when our product is sold in Europe) didn't have 6  gauge UL approved
> cordage. Adapters to allow us to connect our EUT to LISNs  and CDNs 
> for EMI testing likewise were suspect.
> 
> There were other examples, but you get the idea.  We're not talking 
> about using wire nuts and duct tape to kludge together some  AC 
> cords to provide 50A service to our product. All these adapters have
> been  built for a specific purpose, and use the appropriate sized 
> conductors for the  rated current of the plug/connector.
> 
> The class also covered activities which can only be  performed by a 
> "qualified worker" (as defined by OSHA). Examples given were  using 
> a voltmeter to read AC line voltage, or replacing plugs/connectors 
> on AC  mains cords. As we test our products for both domestic (60Hz)
> and European  (50Hz), we have two large synthetic power sources, and
> to avoid destroying  very expensive racks of equipment, we routinely
> check the AC voltage before we  plug in our products. Apparently, we
> are not qualified to do this.
> 
> I understand our plant manager's concern that OSHA  might cite some 
> of these things as safety violations, which would cost us $$$  to 
> rectify, and would probably shut down our lab from doing any work 
> until we  satisfy OSHA. His view is that it's not sufficient that 
> these two labs are  restricted access (all of us working in these 
> labs have been issued numbered,  "do not duplicate" keys), but that 
> there must be detailed instructions for the  use of every item, and 
> for every type of measurement we make, and that any of  this 
> equipment should be locked away within these locked labs (which is a
> non-trivial issue for our EMI lab). He argued that these types of 
> things are  the proverbial "attractive nuisance", prone to abuse.
> 
> My questions are 
> 
> 1) If an OSHA inspector were to visit an EMI or  safety lab, would 
> he be sufficiently knowledgeable as to what type of work is 
> normally done there, or would he essentially "go by the book", and 
> if it isn't  in the NEC or NFPA, it's bad? Does anyone have any 
> experience (good or bad)  with this?
> 
> 2) The thought of having to write, in excruciating  detail, a 
> procedure for every conceivable type of measurement we make, or 
> could make hardly seems a productive use of my time, considering 
> that the  intended audience are already well versed in these 
> practices, and that I  couldn't possibly cover the universe of 
> measurements we may do in the future.  As part of our EMI lab 
> training, we make a general statement that lab  personnel shall be 
> capable of using lab equipment such as voltmeters, current  probes, 
> oscilloscopes, spectrum analyzers etc. for debugging, which implies 
> knowing how to use them to make appropriate measurements. Is this 
> good enough?  What level of detail is appropriate? What do other 
> labs do to address  this?
> 
> John D. Flavin 
> Teradata TCP Engineering 
> 17095 Via del Campo 
> San Diego, CA 92127 
> [email protected] 
> V: (858) 485-3874 
> F: (213) 337-5432 
> -
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> This  message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society 
> emc-pstc  discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your 
> e-mail to <[email protected]>
> 
> All emc-pstc  postings are archived and searchable on the web at 
> http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
> Graphics  (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to
> that URL. 
> 
> Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
> Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
> List  rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 
> 
> For help, send mail to the list administrators:
> Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
> Mike  Cantwell <[email protected]> 
> 
> For policy questions, send mail to:
> Jim Bacher <[email protected]>
> David Heald  <[email protected]> 

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>

Reply via email to