In message <e4c83436df3d724a8d70992643ee9d6203e42...@susday7659.td.teradata.com>, dated Thu, 30 Jul 2009, "Flavin, John" <[email protected]> writes:
>During the course of the class, the instructor showed several >"examples" of items taken from both these labs as possible items which >were "unsafe". This is about par for the course for 'instructors'. They do go by the book - they aren't trained to deviate from it. It is obvious that testing laboratories with highly-trained specialist staff need special treatment. I don't know how that can be achieved in USA, but in Britain it involves contacting the relevant authority at a senior level, thus by-passing the normal 'foot soldiers'. In fact, many such authorities direct ALL incoming enquiries initially to a senior level, because catching the special cases at the beginning leads to a much quieter life! -- OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk Things can always get better. But that's not the only option. John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <[email protected]> Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: <[email protected]> David Heald: <[email protected]>
