HI Ralph,

Nice "out of the box" thinking, however, I suspect spectrum analyzers  
in those earlier days would have had issues in capturing all  
components of the frequency spectrum of a pulsed signal. Just a guess,  
though.

Regards, Ken

Wyatt Technical Services, LLC
56 Aspen Dr.
Woodland Park, CO 80863

Email: [email protected]
Web: www.emc-seminars.com
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kennethwyatt

(719) 310-5418



On Jun 9, 2009, at 9:52 AM, Ralph McDiarmid wrote:

> Could the ESD discrete signal be verified indirectly from  
> measurement in
> the frequency domain with a spectrum analyzer before the advent of GHz
> oscilloscopes?
>
>
> Ralph McDiarmid, AScT
> Compliance Engineering Group
> Xantrex Technology Inc
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of John
> Woodgate
> Sent: Monday, June 08, 2009 9:47 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: EN61326-1: 2006
>
> In message
> <[email protected]>,  
> dated
> Mon, 8 Jun 2009, Ralph McDiarmid <[email protected]> writes:
>
>> It would at least bring it into agreement with the requirements of  
>> both
>
>> the residential and industrial 61000 generic immunity standards. (4kV
>> contact, 8kV air)
>
> But, as Doug says, that is not a sufficient argument. Unless 4kV air  
> can
>
> be shown not to be adequate to prevent an unacceptable number of field
> failures due to ESD damage, it should not be raised to 8 kV.
>
> There may be an explanation. We know that in cold northern countries,
> humidity can fall to 20% and below and a charged human body can  
> reach a
> potential in the region of 15 kV. But this is rare, and 8 kV is
> considered sufficiently severe. Note 'considered': the only proof is
> 'epidemiological' - how many field failures occur?
>
> I suspect that most equipment to which IEC 61326 applies AND is  
> exposed
> to ESD is used in air-conditioned spaces where humidity is kept at
> medium values and ESD voltages do not reach extreme values.
>
> There is a further issue. Until recently, the methods of verifying the
> output of ESD test hand-pieces were subject to considerable doubt and
> much controversy. To check the output waveform, oscilloscope  
> bandwidths
> of at least 6 GHz are required, and these were very rare. So a lot of
> historical data were collected using test equipment whose
> characteristics are subject to significant uncertainty.
> -- 
> OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk
> Things can always get better. But that's not the only option.
> John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK
>
> -
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
> emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your
> e-mail to <[email protected]>
>
> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
> http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
> Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to  
> that
> URL.
>
> Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
> Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
> List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
>
> For help, send mail to the list administrators:
> Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
> Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>
>
> For policy questions, send mail to:
> Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
> David Heald: <[email protected]>
>
> -
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
> emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your
> e-mail to <[email protected]>
>
> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
> http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
> Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to  
> that
> URL.
>
> Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
> Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
> List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
>
> For help, send mail to the list administrators:
> Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
> Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>
>
> For policy questions, send mail to:
> Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
> David Heald: <[email protected]>
>
> -
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc- 
> pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e- 
> mail to <[email protected]>
>
> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
> http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
> Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to  
> that URL.
>
> Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
> Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
> List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
>
> For help, send mail to the list administrators:
> Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
> Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>
>
> For policy questions, send mail to:
> Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
> David Heald: <[email protected]>

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>

Reply via email to