Hi Chas,

This is how I interpret the standard. Somewhere I recall if painted 
surfaces can be penetrated by the point, then Contact also applies.

Cheers,

Derek.

Grasso, Charles wrote:
> The ESD standard is perfectly clear (at least to me) - The product
> is tested using contact discharge for conductive surfaces 
> AND air discharge on insulating surfaces.
>
> I don't perceive an interpretation issue.
>
> If your product is a object constructed entirely 
> of a conductive material - contact discharge only applies. Similarly if
> the product is an object constructed entirely of an insulator then only
> air discharge applies. If your product has combinations of both - then
> both types of discharges apply.
>
> Is this reasoning flawed??
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of John
> Woodgate
> Sent: Friday, May 22, 2009 7:50 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [PSES] ESD testing
>
> In message 
> <[email protected]>, dated 
> Fri, 22 May 2009, Kate Savo <[email protected]> writes:
>
>   
>> Safety/EMC Standards frequently omit the "and" in a list of items such 
>> as you excerpted here from 61000-4-2 - they only put an "or" in where 
>> they truly mean it to be interpreted as such.
>>
>> The "and" is implied and Contact ESD must be done on all conductive 
>> surfaces, and Air ESD on all insulating surfaces. If your product has 
>> both surface types, you should not omit either test scenario. Your 
>> local EMC/ESD lab should confirm this.
>>     
>
> I do not support that interpretation. If the list just said:
>
>   - air discharge;
>
>   - contact discharge
>
> to conductive surfaces, conducting planes and insulating surfaces.
>
> then 'and' might be inferred. But in fact, the inclusion of further 
> words, defining the surfaces to which the two types of discharge shall 
> be applied, excludes such an inference:
>
> a) contact discharge to the conductive surfaces and coupling planes;
>
> b) air discharge at insulating surfaces.
>
>
>   

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>

Reply via email to