Ian,

I agree it probably is wrong, but it was the same in the earlier 1997 edition!
  I guess this is one for John to pass on to the relevant committee

Mike Hurley

Gordon,Ian wrote: 

        All
        There seems to be a typographical error in Table 3 of the above standard
        where the levels specified for ESD testing in controlled environments
        are given as 4kV/8kV (air/contact). However the level for the same test
        given in Table 1 which refers to Basic Immunity Requirements is only
        4kV/4kV (air/contact). This seems wrong since the controlled EM
        environment would be inherently less severe.
        
        Does anyone else believe this to be the case?
         
        
        Ian Gordon 
        
        
        
                  
        
         
        
        --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 
---


--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 
        The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and are
provided solely for the use of the intended recipient(s).
        If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
copying, disclosure, distribution, or use of this e-mail,
        its attachments or any information contained therein is unauthorized and
strictly prohibited and you should please contact the
        sender immediately and delete this e-mail and any attachments from your
system.
        No responsibility is accepted for any virus or defect that might arise 
from
opening this e-mail or attachments, whether or not
        it has been checked by anti-virus software. 
        
        -
        ----------------------------------------------------------------
        This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society 
emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]> 
        
        All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
        http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
        Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to 
that URL.
        
        Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
        Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
        List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
        
        For help, send mail to the list administrators:
        Scott Douglas <[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]> 
        Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]> 
        
        For policy questions, send mail to:
        Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]> 
        David Heald: <[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]> 
        
________________________________



        No virus found in this incoming message.
        Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
        Version: 8.5.329 / Virus Database: 270.12.32/2119 - Release Date: 
05/17/09
16:58:00
        
          


-- 
Mike Hurley

Director
Mead testing ltd

[email protected]
www.meadtest.com
phone 44 (0) 1279 635865
fax   44 (0) 1279 635874
Mead Testing Limited is a company registered in England with company number
4572600 whose registered office is: Unit 25 Mead Park, River Way, Harlow, 
CM20 2SE.  VAT number: 802 3904 59
-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. 

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> 

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <[email protected]>
David Heald <[email protected]> 


Reply via email to