In message <c5b82bbc.39238%[email protected]>, dated Wed, 11 Feb 2009, Ken Javor <[email protected]> writes:
>The price is easily justified. No one has to buy a CDN; the drawings >are in the standard appendix. Some of those drawings, etc., are lacking data and at least one (not of a CDN) is quite misleading. However, I agree that there is usually enough information for making one's own CDNs to be practicable. I've seen 'overkill' solutions that are undoubtedly costly. I haven't yet seen a CDN in a gold-plated box, but it can't be long coming! >So everyone doing this test is faced with a build or buy decision. > >Assuming CDNs are indeed being sold, you have to figure into the >build/buy decision-making process the onerous ISO-9000 related >paperwork that often convinces companies it is easier to buy the >certification paperwork than to go through the process in-house. Why do people assure me that 'ISO 9000 is no trouble at all'? (;-) -- OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk Things can always get better. But that's not the only option. John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <[email protected]> Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: <[email protected]> David Heald: <[email protected]>
